Super V sound after the build

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 26034 times.

MichaelHiFi

Super V sound after the build
« on: 12 Apr 2012, 01:46 am »
Not another Super V sound thread  :?

I wore out my last thread  8)

So the build is done. I'll post a lessons learned on that thread for those interested in building their own. A newbie perspective if there ever was in need of one.

These speakers look great!  :thumb: But how do they sound? Good looking speaking can start looking pretty ugly if they don't deliver great music with the effort and cash spent. Most speakers that have been through my living rooms have been great sounding. I'm not readily willing to bash a manufacturers speaker unless it's quality issues. All have there unique character and sound. All my junk has been very different (duh, can you tell?) and no exception here. Here's a quick chronological list so one knows where I'm coming from.

Zenith clock radio - Played a lot of music through that clock radio :)
Bose 901 -Dad and I built a DIY version, early 1970's - Sounded awful but everyone else thought they were cool because they played loud and with plenty of distortion  :icon_lol:
Yamaha NS500's - Great set of speakers - 1978 and owned for a long time.
DCM Timewindows - They were Dad's reference - to 1990 I think
Def Tech BP2000's - 1995 Another great speaker not so refined but they rocked.
AV123 LS6's. 2004? - Still our past reference. Everything upstream has to be perfect. AC especially. Room yes, Source yes. Perfect. Wow, we still refer to the LS's when we evaluate ALL speakers including the V's. Sold before we learned why all those tweeters hurt at times  :duh:
Dynaudio Confidence C1's. Need power, we had it, they melted.
MBL 121's. Need power, they love it and played well. A speaker that sounded great outside the sweet spot. Impeccable engineering. Cool looking too.
Tyler Acoustic Decade D1's. Smoked the MBL's with great clarity and precision. Good with SS but really liked being fed tubes. Still in our living room but for sale to finance the CC bill on the Super V's  :o

Associated equipment:
Oppo BDP-95 tethered to a USB hard drive
VPI Scoutmaster - Dynavector XXV Mark II cart
PS Audio GCPH phono stage
Allnic L3000 preamp
PS Audio Power Plant Premier on all digital equipment fed by a PS Audio AC12 on a Furutech receptacle on its own 10AWG 20 amp circuit
Decware Torii Mk III fed into a Oyaide R1 receptacle, WPC-Z cover, Acrolink 7 nines copper cable and Oyaide plugs on a dedicated 10awg cyro'd circuit of 20 amps.
Synergistic Research Tesla speaker cables.
Morrow SP3 interconnects on the sub amps.
Electra cables (Danny's recommendation) on the amp.
Lot's of room treatments, cones, sand, and even a Schumann frequency generator set at 6.83Hz. Stop it - don't go there  :nono:

Super V's.

Why Super V's. We were looking to build a pair of LS9's. My wife and I both miss the 6's. Noting in the web site, there was much mention of the Super V's. A Call to Danny and shortly after we had an order in forgoing the notion of building or acquiring line arrays.

I was fortunate enough to have a gentleman come to my rescue when my Torii melted down after battling a distortion issue. The transformer went up in smoke and boy did it stink! Scott, who lives not far away offered up a Onix SP3 while I waited and waited and waited for the eventual arrival of the Torii. I bought a set of V-Caps ($600) while it was in the shop. I must be crazy  :bawl:

Now we have to wait and wait and wait for these damn things to break in. But I can't wait for, or at least give some thoughts about the Super V's.
Through the Onix: This amp is either an overachiever or it simply sounds great with V's, OR, the V's don't need exotic amplification. Initially, the V's sounded good, bright as one would expect with raw caps but having the ability to dial in bass to your room was welcome if not needed so much in our room. Having 4 server controlled woofers not in the confines of a cabinet must to be heard. I just couldn't pick up room issues with the bass but in all honesty, my room was treated. We didn't note much change in the bass performance but I did have to constantly tune due to the change of amps, 2 volume controls, and the break-in of caps. The Onix/V's combination provided a reasonable stage, not close to the best I've heard but good. It would gain in depth as you cranked the volume and lock in better a central image. This is an easy thing to perform with the Torii's as they seem to possess limitless volume. The reason for that is the way they handle all spectrum of sound. Once the Jupiter's were settled in (and the Sonic caps), they provided a warm full bodied tone that when called upon, was nuanced with detail and air.
Through the Torii we knew were in a different league. The music became lush, warm, friendly and inviting. It's rather constrained in the amount of air and staging we hear but again, the caps have maybe 18 hours on them. My understanding is that these V-Caps need 500 to 1000 hours to settle in. And the journey will be tough. In these 18 hours though, one could tell that magic will and in some cases, was happening. On a few numbers we cranked the volume and was rewarded with a sound that was very close to the best we've heard. What is missing from the V's and maybe from the tube counterpart, are any sort of hardness that we too often experienced. What is delivered is a midrange that invites vocalists to sing and be heard. Another nuance of note was the blending of subs to the rest of the system. I/we could not pick up the transitioning between subs and midrange unless the subs were dialed up way too far. How'd he do that?

That's my 5 cents worth in this early audition.   :)




SoCalWJS

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #1 on: 12 Apr 2012, 03:24 am »
Thanks for the early mini review. I know I was mightily impressed by the Super-V's at RMAF and I think they will continue to improve with more time and finding the right synergy with associated equipment.
Interesting reading about your comments on the "glare" on the LS-6'es and how that was overcome - you used the PS Powerplant/equiv? I'm sorely tempted to try one on my system, but have zero conficence in what to get and which technology to go with. Seems to be some "magic" involved, but it could be magic that works.

Decisions, decisions.  :scratch:

MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #2 on: 12 Apr 2012, 04:27 am »
Thanks for the early mini review. I know I was mightily impressed by the Super-V's at RMAF and I think they will continue to improve with more time and finding the right synergy with associated equipment.
Interesting reading about your comments on the "glare" on the LS-6'es and how that was overcome - you used the PS Powerplant/equiv? I'm sorely tempted to try one on my system, but have zero conficence in what to get and which technology to go with. Seems to be some "magic" involved, but it could be magic that works.

Decisions, decisions.  :scratch:

We performed a lot of techniques on the LS6's including felting around the tweeters which helped a little. I would just borrow or ask Paul Gowan of PS Audio for a loaner. PS Audio is another good audio company to work with.

There's no magic about getting rid of noise on your AC X 12 Neo 8 tweeters as I recall?   :wink:

Cheeseboy

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #3 on: 12 Apr 2012, 09:39 pm »
I'm in the same boat.  I was head banging last night (Weds are Seattle Grunge night) as the girl is out of town and I can't help but think at those volume levels on my LS6 with all of that tweeter surface area the glare I'm experiencing is AC power noise.  If I don't fix that I'll go deaf.  I'm sure that I'm in the same boat as SoCal when I ask if $2200 for a PS Premier power plant is over kill.  That's half way to a used Pass Labs 350.5! 

What is the best way to find something in between?  I did see a Shunyata Hydra 8 on ebay for $250.  I guess borrow something from the local hi fi dealer.  Does PI still have the Magic buss in circulation?  The CB guy in Bodega is driving me crazy at night too.  I hear him every time the stereo is on.


SoCalWJS

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #4 on: 12 Apr 2012, 10:29 pm »
....don't wanna derail this thread, but...
Been cruising multiple sites and looking at a bunch of alternatives. Just about got myself talked into a PS P5 or maybe an Elgar (although many good things are said of the Shunyata).
Wish I knew more about the BUSS products or had a chance to demo some of these things. I don't have a good relationship with a local dealer - heck, there isn't even a decent dealer within an hours drive from my place. :(
Tough to justify a minimum of $1000 on one of these things (and more like $2500 for a used/demo P5 on Audiogon) when I just don't really understand the science (or snake oil for the cynical) behind these things. (OK, the P5 makes some sense  :green:)

....back to the topic at hand.

So Michael, ya gonna have a bunch a different amps brought in to do a comparison in front of an audience anytime?  :green:

MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #5 on: 13 Apr 2012, 12:32 am »
Comrades, I felt your pain - ear pain.

The Power Plant Premier isn't so much a filter (I think it is anyway) but an AC regenerator. I can only dream of a Running Springs dmitri. Why? Why would I be interested in such an expensive AC conditioner. Makes no sense huh.

Problem is, it all starts from the wall outlet then whatever you have after that fact. When you start dealing with higher resolutions, high quality gear, high sensitivity speakers, what eventually reaches your ears started as an AC signal with plenty of garbage but never really gets dealt with in most gear. Pass does it internally in there amps and don't want you to plug into a line conditioner. But digital gear and possibly low power amps seem to play cleaner with less noise through these expensive AC products.

I didn't believe in any of this garbage. I had a wildly expensive system, Classe amps and DAC, Theta, Audio Research just plugged into a wall socket. One day a dealer loaned me a cord. Crap. I was extremely doubtful a cord cord make any audible difference. But what I heard stunned me. The music left my speakers. Then I really started playing with the AC circuits. Ever since, I didn't want to think about the AC feeds being the bottleneck. Think about that for a second. Do we want to play with all of our treasures with little regard to the food they eat  :o
I don't think the Super would suffer as much if any, the same issue(s) as the LS's. Those tweeters are GREAT  :thumb: Those tweeters are EVIL  :icon_twisted:

Be careful with the PPP. The early models had/have issues. I believe the newer models are better. And if someone wants to drop a Dmitri into my system - go for it  :D

The get-to-gether is all about listening to the V's and amps, DAC's or whatever that one wants to bring. Consider this a class with wine and music  :lol:
« Last Edit: 13 Apr 2012, 01:38 am by MichaelHiFi »

HAL

  • Industry Contributor
  • Posts: 5532
Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #6 on: 13 Apr 2012, 12:49 am »
I have my PS Audio Power Plant Premier running from one of Dave's UberBUSS and it sounds great with the Super-V's.  I run all the amps off the PPP including the Pass Labs Aleph 2 monoblocks. 

I have my older PS Audio P300 running the front end. :)

Danny Richie

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #7 on: 13 Apr 2012, 01:09 am »
I use some really good power cables and a PI Audio Uber Buss in front of my Dodd Audio balanced power supply. The combination is really good. Going back to plugging straight into the wall outlets is not even an option.

My Mac Mini, external hard drive, DAC, and pre-amp are all off the grid.  :thumb: Battery power rules. And my Mac Mini, external hard drive, and DAC are plugged into a PI Audio Battery buss. It makes the battery power even better.

If the new power supplies are ready in time I will be showing a system at Lone Star Audio fest that is totally off the grid. So even the 30 watt tube mono-blocks will be battery powered. Well, now that I think about it, those servo subs (servo amps) will be on the grid. 

kp93300

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #8 on: 13 Apr 2012, 01:13 am »
Hi MichealHi Fi ,

Just want to share that you can run in your V cap with this simple circuit.
Please see the link :
http://phonoclone.com/diy-rack.html

thanks for sharing your experience.

regards
kp93300

MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #9 on: 13 Apr 2012, 01:49 am »
Hi MichealHi Fi ,

Just want to share that you can run in your V cap with this simple circuit.
Please see the link :
http://phonoclone.com/diy-rack.html

thanks for sharing your experience.

regards
kp93300

That is a great link, Thanks KP  :thumb:

Unfortunately, the caps are soldered inside the amp, and I just paid $100 dollars, unknown that' I'd have too, (long story) to have those caps soldered in. So for now, I leave the amp playing through the day on repeat to log time.

The first night I was brilliant  :wave: I put a CD in on repeat, powered up all my equipment, then engaged the mute circuit and went to bed. At around 1:30am that night and woke up  :idea: having the mute circuit engaged does nothing for the caps that are inside the amp. What an idiot  :duh:

Sometimes I wonder how I have the job that I have.... :roll:




MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #10 on: 13 Apr 2012, 02:01 am »
I use some really good power cables and a PI Audio Uber Buss in front of my Dodd Audio balanced power supply. The combination is really good. Going back to plugging straight into the wall outlets is not even an option.

My Mac Mini, external hard drive, DAC, and pre-amp are all off the grid.  :thumb: Battery power rules. And my Mac Mini, external hard drive, and DAC are plugged into a PI Audio Battery buss. It makes the battery power even better.

If the new power supplies are ready in time I will be showing a system at Lone Star Audio fest that is totally off the grid. So even the 30 watt tube mono-blocks will be battery powered. Well, now that I think about it, those servo subs (servo amps) will be on the grid.

That's a nice setup Danny,

My plan is to acquire a MAC mini - the latest model with the low jitter spec's out its SPDIF, and into a DAC of my choice. If It's worth getting the MAC off the grid. shouldn't be a problem with so many options. The Oppo tethered to a hard drive through the USB isn't bad at all, but I know there's something missing. I may get a chance to revisit my Classe DAC 1 of many years ago. I sold it to a friend for a song and now he wants to sell it. That was a $4K dac!
I'm intrigued with the NAD M51.

I'll have to check out that battery bus.

Jonathon Janusz

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 908
Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #11 on: 13 Apr 2012, 02:55 am »
Michael, I hope you don't mind if I try to learn something today, considering the thread has steered itself a bit off course. . . :)

For folks who run power conditioners/regenerators and or independent power supplies (read: Dodd balanced unit), there is something I've wondered, knowing very little about power supplies and such other than what goes in one end and what is supposed to come out the other.

One of the advantages of high efficiency speaker designs is the opportunity to use lower power amplifiers with the same great results folks with lower efficiency speakers and bigger amps enjoy.  In the interests of "going green", I've been kind of appreciative of the low power consumption and high efficiency of the digital amp I've had for a while (and digital amp designs in general).  My question is whether or not these power products placed upstream of the amplifier (or amp's power supplies) defeat this power efficiency advantage of the digital amplifiers?  In other words, what is the idle/continuous power draw of these power products?  Or put yet another way, if one goes down the road of this kind of power conditioning, does the efficiency of the amp on the other end become basically irrelevant, accounting for the power used by the power devices themselves, meaning you may as well put tubes or class-a power on the other end because the power company's meter on your house is going to be spinning the same regardless?

Thanks!

Danny Richie

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #12 on: 13 Apr 2012, 12:57 pm »
Quote
My plan is to acquire a MAC mini - the latest model with the low jitter spec's out its SPDIF

I use an I2S direct output to my DAC.

MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #13 on: 13 Apr 2012, 02:24 pm »
The PPP has power Zone functions such as switched, always on, delayed and triggered using a standard trigger cable from your equipment. You can program it in a variety of ways so the unit shuts down and little power is consumed.

There's a lot of verbiage regarding "green" power. But I think the question you ask is how much power does it consume when you're simply listening to your favorite music. Any device that produces heat is using power at the meter and that's additional power above what your equipment is burning.

I have a solar project in mind to help ease or eliminate our healthy appetite for power. I haven't found much information on how inverter power affects audio components  :scratch: Now I'm way off topic.

Yesterday afternoon the rig wasn't sounding so well. Last night it was almost a spiritual experience. I had to light a candle.




SoCalWJS

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #14 on: 13 Apr 2012, 02:52 pm »
Nice photo!

So what changed between yesterday afternoon and last night?

MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #15 on: 13 Apr 2012, 04:04 pm »
The V-Caps

We expect this for weeks to come  :|

corndog71

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1769
  • Some people call me Rob.
Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #16 on: 13 Apr 2012, 07:23 pm »
Nice photo!

So what changed between yesterday afternoon and last night?

Probably noise on the grid is lower too.  I know my system sounds better at night.

SoCalWJS

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #17 on: 13 Apr 2012, 07:35 pm »
The V-Caps

We expect this for weeks to come  :|
Wow!
I wouldn't expect that noticable of a change in such a short period of time. - Imagine if it continues to do so for quite a while  :thumb:

I figure you're still using various power conditioning products, so I guessed it wasn't that. I was listening to my system in the wee hours this morning and was thinking "this sounds pretty good", then just a few minutes later  :(. Gotta figure this stuff out. Don't know if something in the house cycled on or what - could be any of several different things. Ah well, after we get back from vacation, I'll get serious about some form of AC treatment.

Cheeseboy

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #18 on: 13 Apr 2012, 08:43 pm »
If the new power supplies are ready in time I will be showing a system at Lone Star Audio fest that is totally off the grid. So even the 30 watt tube mono-blocks will be battery powered. Well, now that I think about it, those servo subs (servo amps) will be on the grid.

Hey you're in Texas.  You might as well trickle charge all of those batteries with a solar panel.  Then you could truly say that you are off the grid. 

MichaelHiFi

Re: Super V sound after the build
« Reply #19 on: 13 Apr 2012, 09:17 pm »
System doesn't sound so great now. So it'll continue to burn. Even B-Tribe took a few strides back from where it was last night.

I know about the early morning listening sessions. Always seems to be better at night. I want it "better" all the time.