No-rez substitute

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 18827 times.

Danny Richie

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #20 on: 21 Apr 2012, 05:07 am »
So, is No-Rez basically a slab of open cell foam with some sort of adhesive & bitumen (?) layer on one of the sides of it?

It has a heavy damping layer made from an non-resonant composite with a pressure sensitive adhesive for easy peal and stick applications. And on top of that is a 1" thick open cell foam layer.

aharami

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #21 on: 10 Jun 2012, 11:14 pm »
can i use dynamat type product for the vinyl layer?  I have a roll of Raammat left over from my car audio days that I just found

http://www.raamaudio.com/products/RAAMmat-BXT-II.html

aharami

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #22 on: 10 Jun 2012, 11:16 pm »
Why mess with PE, isn't this cheaper?
http://www.thefoamfactory.com/packagingfoam/charcoalfoam.html#FirmCharcoal

which foam above matches No-rez the best?  the charcoal regular foam or the charcoal firm foam?

Danny Richie

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #23 on: 11 Jun 2012, 02:17 pm »
can i use dynamat type product for the vinyl layer?  I have a roll of Raammat left over from my car audio days that I just found

http://www.raamaudio.com/products/RAAMmat-BXT-II.html

You can use that stuff with good effectiveness. It is 60 mils thick too. That is not bad. The damping layer on No Rez is 70 mils thick. So it is pretty close.

As far as foam goes any open cell type foam works fine. It can also be used in conjunction with a loose poly fill or fiberglass insulation.

aharami

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #24 on: 11 Jun 2012, 05:57 pm »
thanks Danny!

Steve1138

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 6
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #25 on: 27 Jun 2021, 03:25 pm »
Im considering using anti-drumming panels used for vibration damping on sheet metal and in cars. some are a bit over 2mm (80 mils or 80 thou as we say in the UK)  but that should still be OK.

Hobbsmeerkat

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 2646
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #26 on: 27 Jun 2021, 09:54 pm »
Im considering using anti-drumming panels used for vibration damping on sheet metal and in cars. some are a bit over 2mm (80 mils or 80 thou as we say in the UK)  but that should still be OK.

Correct.

Ive used a similar 80-mil Butyl-based automotive damping on cheap stamped speaker frames with excellent results. Its not as stiff but it also means it's easier to form-fit onto awkwardly shaped objects, like frames, corners or plastic horns. Tho it should work just fine so long as its covered with a similar foam, infill or fabric layer.

I believe the Carnegie version of the N3 (CST-1) that Danny sold for a while also used self-adhesive vinyl tiles, to help with resonance issues.

Skilly

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #27 on: 28 Jun 2021, 02:39 am »
I think there may be other photos of this elsewhere on the site, but for the sake of clarity here is my image of a cross section of No Rez with a ruler image for size reference. In this image, the backing is still on shown in the photo.


Shives

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 250
  • I like French fries
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #28 on: 28 Jun 2021, 02:27 pm »
I don’t think there is any suitable replacements for No Res. It’s the only product like it on the market. Alternative like ones offered at Part express is a multi-layer.. with a layer being in the middle witch of I’m hearing correctly can possibly add reflection problems.

Essentially I think this No res is all one material, as it looks like a portion of the foam is heat compressed maybe, like a good half inch maybe or more. Which makes the backing, then the layer of pressure sensitive adhesive is added to the back. Making it all one material and such. Just my guess making it easy to use with many applications.

Not really a close substitute, but something that can work not as good but will get you by. Go to Home Depot or Lowe’s, and grab a sample or two of the flooring.. the faux wood floors with stick backing. If your carful you can split this sticky layer off. Then, attach a flooring foam to the other side or a dense open cell foam. The carpet padding is better. If your in a pinch, have a long area to do, this method I’ve seen used and people happy.

For the extra efforts, cost of gas, then spray glue, an foam… time and cost, your better off with No res.

Can’t beat it for the price.

Peter J

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1893
  • Hmmmm
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #29 on: 28 Jun 2021, 03:36 pm »
Not true Shives. No Rez is actually two separate things bonded together. The damping layer is some kind of binder with a high mineral content. Somewhat like mineral filled vinyl used in studios and home theaters to mitigate sound transmission. Bonded to this is a foam layer that acts as box stuffing, effectively diffusing internal sound waves.

The Sonic Barrier that parts express sells is similar except that there's a second thin layer of foam that separates the adhesive from the damping layer. This doesn't provide the same damping qualities that bonding directly to the panel provides. And because Sonic Barrier places the damping layer away from the panel it has the effect of making box volume smaller.

The most effective way to seat-of-pants reverse engineer what No Rez does is too consider its two different functions. The damping layer could be something dense, yet flexible. Perhaps linoleum floor tile. And by the way linoleum and vinyl are not the same thing. The heavier, (in weight), the better. The box stuffing could be foam, poly fill, fiberglass, wool, etc. One of the key things to consider is that this needs to be somewhat sound transparent or it can affect box volume.


WGH

Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #30 on: 28 Jun 2021, 04:41 pm »
The heavier, (in weight), the better.

That is why I used 2 layers of the self-stick floor tile in my DIY experiment. The 3M Hi-Strength 90 spray adhesive on the floor tile is necessary when tiling tower speakers. Even though the tile has adhesive the glue is designed to be used horizontally. Stick them on a wall or vertical surface and sometimes they peal off. The 3M adhesive makes them stick permanently.

LarryD56

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 126
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #31 on: 28 Jun 2021, 04:58 pm »
   The 3M spray is good advice. We use to use it all the time when applying self-adhesives. I have never had anything come loose when using that method.

Larry D.

daleda1

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 22
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #32 on: 28 Jun 2021, 09:21 pm »
I have been restoring a mint pair of Dynaco A25’s and made some “hillbilly” no rez using self stick tiles and some 1” upholstery foam. Cut the tiles first for all their placements and then cut foam to match. Used gorilla glue (sparingly) on foam and pressed onto tile. Removed self stick paper and put in place.


daleda1

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 22
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #33 on: 28 Jun 2021, 09:22 pm »
Sorry for upside down pic but you get the idea.

Barryg443

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 63
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #34 on: 29 Jun 2021, 01:08 am »
A few years ago when rebuilding an old pair of polk sda speakers, I used a combination of dynamat and black hole from sonicraft.  At the time I had never heard of No-Res.  Black hole has gone up in price it seems, next project will get no-res!

Barry

Endo2112

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 214
  • Particularist
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #35 on: 29 Jun 2021, 04:36 am »

I'm a fan of the No-Rez for it's composite layer, but not the open cell foam as I doubt there is much benefit from it compared to regular roxal insulation etc. Replace the foam with some aero-gel and I bet the results will be far superior, just thinking next level performance, without cost constraints. I have some for experimenting and will report back after I give it a go.

Cheers,

Don


Shives

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 250
  • I like French fries
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #36 on: 29 Jun 2021, 08:59 pm »
Yikes, that’s why I used words like I think, looks like. But hey, no problem. My apologies.

Toecutter

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 63
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #37 on: 2 Jul 2021, 12:47 am »
I saw some garden kneeling mats at  the store they are 1 1-1/2 Eva foam with a thick rubber (1/8 inch maybe)bonded to it I wonder if that would be a decent substitute.

Vince in TX

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 381
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #38 on: 2 Jul 2021, 01:48 am »
Interesting topic.   I actually stapled an entire layer off 6.4mm thick rubber vibration dampening material from AudiMute on the subfloor of the theater room.   It’s made from recycled tires, so it’s very inexpensive relative to other materials.   This worked really well.   You can barely hear any sound in the rooms below when the speakers are blaring.   I used some excess and cut it into strips to put under my X-Voce not only to separate it from the glass surface of the cabinet but also to tilt it up slightly (I may tilt it some more by adding more strips).

Now I’m wondering if it could be a substitute for all of the other things mentioned.





Speaker Challenged

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 161
Re: No-rez substitute
« Reply #39 on: 2 Jul 2021, 02:28 am »
OK, after 3 hours of searching for it, I give up  :x
I know that I have read something somewhere about how to fudge up a no-rez substitute using (may be) lino tiles, a heap of contact adhesive and acoustic foam or something like that??
I only ask as I am pretty sure that I have also read that its not worth the money to ship O/S as its kinda bulky!
Is my memory serving me here and/or are there other/better options available?
Thanks guys
I used the self adhesive floor tile and foam trick. I also used polyfill behind the drivers as per Danny's advice.  :thumb:
I cut to shape both adhesive floor tiles (hardware store) and foam (ebay). Sprayed on some selley's spray adhesive to the inside of the box (maybe a little overboard here). Then peeled and stuck the floor tiles in place. I then peeled and stuck the acoustic foam to the tiles.