Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 3573 times.

Flashman

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 98
  • Devialet Expert 220 Pro and Vivd Oval 1.5s
Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« on: 27 Jan 2012, 09:54 am »
(Article from Jan. 27, 2012 Wall Street Journal)

It's Alive!  Vinyl Makes a Comeback

By ERIC FELTEN



The digital revolution was supposed to do away with a lot of fusty old relics. First compact discs took their toll on the long-playing (and long-played) vinyl record; then iPods and digital downloads began doing the same to CDs. But long after the eulogies had been delivered, the vinyl LP has been revived.

The LP still represents just a sliver of music sales. But last year, according to Nielsen SoundScan data, while CD sales fell by more than 5%, vinyl record sales grew more than 36%.

The majority of vinyl sells in independent record stores, which have championed the format in their quixotic quest to survive. But now big-box stores such as Best Buy are carrying vinyl. Amazon—loath to let any niche escape its domination—has a "Vinyl Store" and recently introduced shipping boxes designed to coddle LP records in transit.

Not just the sales of records are growing, but the equipment to play them, too. As David Bakula, who follows LPs for Nielsen, puts it: "When I walked into Target and found turntables, then I knew we've arrived."

United Record Pressing, the Nashville factory where the Beatles' first U.S. singles were stamped nearly 50 years ago, is feeling the boom: "This plant often runs 24 hours," says Jay Millar, its marketing director.

Who's buying? Hipster-centric indie genres skew vinyl-heavy—alt rock, garage, punk. The list of last year's best-selling LPs includes discs from the Black Keys, Bon Iver, Fleet Foxes and Radiohead. Classic jazz does pretty well, and then there is classic rock: For several years running, the Beatles' "Abbey Road" (1969) has been the top-selling vinyl LP.

Which is one clue to vinyl's appeal. Yes, "Abbey Road" is an essential recording. But it also features what may be the most recognizable image in rock—the fab (and by then estranged) four scissoring across the street on a bright summer day. Such album artwork just isn't quite the same shrank down for CDs or iPods.

Then there is the sound: Those who collect LPs swear by the virtues of analog. For decades a vinyl-dedicated subset of hard-core audiophiles have resisted the digital onslaught. They've rightly derided the brittle compression of CDs and given the cold shoulder to even the more robust digital formats, such as super-audio CDs. (Don't get them started on the hopeless degradation of MP3s.)

And yet that narrow niche of audiophiles with their Ferrari-dear sound systems isn't what has kept LPs alive. Even, it would seem, in the rarefied world of classical recordings. When the San Francisco Symphony packaged its acclaimed recordings of Gustav Mahler's orchestral works, the set was first made available on SACD. But now it has been released on vinyl as well. According to the symphony's general manager, John Kieser, the idea to release "The Mahler Project" on LPs started a few years ago with his then-teenage son, who collected vinyl and insisted that music sounds different in the old analog format.

Mr. Kieser was also keeping track of the sort of sales statistics Nielsen collects. The symphony released the 22-LP Mahler box in part because "vinyl is the only hard format that has seen any growth." There were 500 boxed sets in the initial run, substantial both in price and heft—$750 and more than 30 pounds. Mr. Kieser says only one or two of the sets are left, a month after the official release.

The Mahler box features heavyweight 180-gram discs. That sort of luxury LP makes up about a quarter of the vinyl market. "It's like picking up a toaster from the '50s," says Mr. Millar of United Record Pressing. "You feel like you've got something substantial."

Substantial. That's the word I keep hearing from the fans of vinyl. Records are admirably physical, the antithesis of the everywhere-and-nowhere airiness of "the cloud."

The embrace of vinyl isn't just some retro fad, but a push-back against the techno-triumphalism that insists there is no future for physical artifacts like books and newspapers. It's a small declaration of independence, a refusal to let the march of progress stomp on one's pleasures.

Vinyl is an assertion that efficiency isn't everything. Cars may have done in the buggy, but there still are people who like horses. Engines on watercraft have long obviated the need to mess about with furling and unfurling canvas, luffing and gybing and all the other soggy inconveniences. And yet there are those who choose sailboats. Who needs wine corks when bottle-caps do the job?

Vinyl is decidedly inconvenient, which is the very reason it appeals. To play records, you have to be relatively engaged in the activity. The disc has to be taken off the shelf and out of its sleeve. It has to be placed on the platter. The needle has to be lowered just so. How different that is from the way we've been encouraged to consume music—as a sort of automated aural wallpaper best achieved by a digital playlist in shuffle mode. Vinyl demands—and encourages—more attention. "If I'm cooking or cleaning around the house, I'll plug in the iPhone or play CDs," says Nick Blandford, managing director of the Jagjaguwar record label, home to the indie-folk-rock band Bon Iver. "But if I'm sitting down deliberately to listen to music, I'll listen to vinyl."

Douger

Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #1 on: 27 Jan 2012, 01:24 pm »
Thanks for posting this :D

vinyl_guy

Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #2 on: 29 Jan 2012, 12:29 am »
Great post.

Quote
"If I'm cooking or cleaning around the house, I'll plug in the iPhone or play CDs," says Nick Blandford, managing director of the Jagjaguwar record label, home to the indie-folk-rock band Bon Iver. "But if I'm sitting down deliberately to listen to music, I'll listen to vinyl."
Truer words have not been spoken :thumb: That describes my listening habits to a T

SteveFord

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 6432
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #3 on: 29 Jan 2012, 12:46 am »
I'm still struggling to find digital which sounds right but that may not be possible. 
I kind of feel like Don Quixote with this quest.
Thank god for albums and tube FM tuners!

Guy 13

Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #4 on: 29 Jan 2012, 12:52 am »
Hi all Audio Circle members.
Thanks for that super post. I agree 200% with it's content.
Guy 13

midfi

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 122
  • nisi credideritis, non intelligetis
Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #5 on: 29 Jan 2012, 02:23 am »
I think when it's all said and done, vinyl will be peering over the edge into the trash heap at the MP3 laying on the bottom of the can while simultaneously attempting to push the CD in behind it!

Of course that's my opinion, I could be wrong!  :lol:

digital es mort, vive la analog!

SET Man

Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #6 on: 29 Jan 2012, 02:45 am »
Hey!

    It is always a good thing to see a mainstream paper like WSJ talking about the virtues of analog vinyls. :D

    I got into vinyl back in early '90s, you know when most people were busy getting rid of their LPs :lol: I got in it for the sound not for it nostalgia... although I have to admit that came after. :D

    Yes, it is good to see more and more new releases on vinyls these days. But my only concern about this is how many of those albums new and old were actually mastered from analog master, if the master were analog at all. They should use the code on the LP jacket to let the consumer know... remember the code on the back of the early CD like DDD, ADD and etc?

    Anyway, I totally agreed that when I put on a good LP it really commanded me to really listening and more involving musically than 16 bit CD sound.

Take care,
Buddy :thumb:

TONEPUB

Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #7 on: 29 Jan 2012, 05:19 am »
You probably shouldn't be reproducing entire articles from the WSJ (or any other publication) in full without their express permission.   It does violate copyright law and leave the owner of this site at risk for legal action...



macrojack

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 3826
Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #8 on: 29 Jan 2012, 02:01 pm »
Just what I needed - validation from the Murdoch Empire. Before I got the word from the WSJ that it was not only okiedokie but possibly even cool to own and play LPs, I was hiding from the public, taking my meals alone, spinning disks covertly and seeing a shrink. Now I can cut him loose and open the blinds. I'm blissfully free. I'm out. Let freedom ring.....

Elizabeth

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2737
  • So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #9 on: 29 Jan 2012, 02:30 pm »
You probably shouldn't be reproducing entire articles from the WSJ (or any other publication) in full without their express permission.   It does violate copyright law and leave the owner of this site at risk for legal action...
Agree completely.
The problem is IF the copyright holder gets annoyed, THEN the legal costs would bankrupt the site owner before any action took place anyway. Just the legal fees would kill nearly any site.
The proper way to offer a complete article is to put in the link to the original article. And NOT to just word for word posting of it.
Some companies are really harsh about this. And in fact the owner of the site here should be notified of the copyright infringement so it can be deleted. At least if you LIKE this site and hope it stays around...

doug s.

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 6572
  • makin' music
Re: Article on vinyl from today's Wall Street Journal
« Reply #10 on: 29 Jan 2012, 04:30 pm »
You probably shouldn't be reproducing entire articles from the WSJ (or any other publication) in full without their express permission.   It does violate copyright law and leave the owner of this site at risk for legal action...
Agree completely.
The problem is IF the copyright holder gets annoyed, THEN the legal costs would bankrupt the site owner before any action took place anyway. Just the legal fees would kill nearly any site.
The proper way to offer a complete article is to put in the link to the original article. And NOT to just word for word posting of it.
Some companies are really harsh about this. And in fact the owner of the site here should be notified of the copyright infringement so it can be deleted. At least if you LIKE this site and hope it stays around...
while i understand the sentiment, in this case i do not see any worry - the source of the article was cited, (tho it would have been better to post the actual link), and it was complimentary, in a forum that the wsj would likely appreciate getting the added exposure.

ymmv,

doug s.