CD player advances?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 13475 times.

SteveFord

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 6432
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #20 on: 2 Jan 2012, 09:25 pm »
I'm going to burn another CD-R now that I've changed those tubes for a fairer comparison.  The tubes changed a neutral sounding preamp (Sonic Frontiers SFL-2) into a really dynamic unit with great lower midrange and depth.  Who woulda thought two stupid tubes could do that?  Not me.
The good news is that I'm no longer preamp shopping.
The system is 1.7s, SFL-2 and VTL MB250s so it can make some noise, all right.

I listened to the vinyl, listened to the CD in the Jolida with mounting horror, swapped in another Jolida, swapped that for a Harman Kardon and then listened to the same CD-R in the Hhb. 
I also went from the Direct to CD inputs on the preamp with the same wretched results.  I swapped all of the preamp's tubes, I swapped speaker cables, I even lugged a pair of VTL 300 DeLuxes upstairs to give it a shot and the end result is not even close.
It's really time to upgrade the digital end.  It must be the players, the digital medium can't be that bad.  They've had a long time to screw around with it. 
As a tax paying American citizen I demand my perfect sound forever!

neobop

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 3446
  • BIRD LIVES
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #21 on: 2 Jan 2012, 11:17 pm »
Maybe your CD-R isn't that good.

Or maybe you're pissing in the wind.

What about adding a DAC?  You already have transports that are not likely to be improved on, you'll get more for your money by just adding the DAC hardware.

I don't have an easy answer but that might be the way to go. It seems to me you'll get closer to the "best" if you get a really good DAC. Maybe you could try one or two on loan from a friendly dealer? Trying that might also reveal which transport is the better one. CD is a crazy medium. The disc spins between 200 and 500 RPM. Error, jitter correction etc are all in the DAC aren't they? Why keep buying the same mediocrity over and over again?

Old timer

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 78
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #22 on: 2 Jan 2012, 11:17 pm »
Freo-1: Has Dan made significant changes within the past 2 years? The reason my asking, I had a Modwright/Sony 9100 Signature Truth and actually preferred the stock Sony outputs over the tube output.

SteveRB

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #23 on: 3 Jan 2012, 05:23 pm »
My digital set up is a Mac Mini with a decent DAC. You spoke of convenience in the original post; nothing is more convenient than having your entire CD collection accessible from one source. And, controlling it from an iPhone/iPod is amazingly simple. Accessing the music from a solid state drive means no more spinning parts, and a separate DAC allows for future upgrades. I am now completely Lp based or lossless file. The CDs are stored. You can certainly be up and running for $1500 easy.

Another added benefit is using the Mac Mini as an audio/video/web enabled media server and file sharing unit.

The main pitfall is setting up and ripping your CDs properly. There are a few very good guides to doing this, but it does take time. Also, backing up your data is important. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested.

I really think that buying an expensive CD player at this point in time is a little short sighted (just my opinion -- not trying to start anything).

Freo-1

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #24 on: 3 Jan 2012, 11:20 pm »
Freo-1: Has Dan made significant changes within the past 2 years? The reason my asking, I had a Modwright/Sony 9100 Signature Truth and actually preferred the stock Sony outputs over the tube output.

Cannot comment about the Modwright Sony.  However, the Modwright Oppo BD-83SE Nuforce is a truly remarkable unit.  We compared it to a lot of CD players, DAC's, etc, and the Modwright Oppo was a lot better in all cases.  That unit is so good, that I sent in my BD-95 for the tube upgrade. 

There is a synergy with the Oppo units and Dan's upgrades that exceeds the sum of the parts. 

SteveFord

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 6432
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #25 on: 4 Jan 2012, 02:58 am »
I enlisted some younger and better ears and my wife is now a vinyl fan.
Neobop got me thinking so I used Revolver by the Beatles with a Capitol vinyl pressing, the recently remastered CD and a copy I burned from the CD.

The verdict:
Vinyl es muy bueno
Something is wrong with the CD
CD-R is El Sucko.

This tells me it's time to sell a Jolida and upgrade the CD player, buy a DAC for the remaining Jolida (or Harman Kardon, whichever works out better) and upgrade the CD burner as well as time has passed the old Hhb by.
Only then will I be able to perform a meaningful comparison.


PDR

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 820
  • May the best man win
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #26 on: 4 Jan 2012, 03:34 am »
Good luck Steve!

Can hardly wait to see what you come up with..... :thumb:

neobop

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 3446
  • BIRD LIVES
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #27 on: 4 Jan 2012, 01:09 pm »
Steve,
A couple of yrs ago Letitroll told me about a $110 Chinese DAC that made a big difference in his CD playback. I have a entry level Yamaha changer that's around 12 yrs old. I guess it spins the disk okay cause with the DAC it sometimes sounds like music. Actually, the change was remarkable.

My digital set up is a Mac Mini with a decent DAC. You spoke of convenience in the original post; nothing is more convenient than having your entire CD collection accessible from one source. And, controlling it from an iPhone/iPod is amazingly simple. Accessing the music from a solid state drive means no more spinning parts, and a separate DAC allows for future upgrades. I am now completely Lp based or lossless file. The CDs are stored. You can certainly be up and running for $1500 easy.

Another added benefit is using the Mac Mini as an audio/video/web enabled media server and file sharing unit.

The main pitfall is setting up and ripping your CDs properly. There are a few very good guides to doing this, but it does take time. Also, backing up your data is important. I can point you in the right direction if you are interested.

I really think that buying an expensive CD player at this point in time is a little short sighted (just my opinion -- not trying to start anything).

IMO you don't have to be Nostradamus to see that this is the way of the future. How this sort of thing fits in with your plans, you'll have to figure out. I really don't know if dropping $1K or more on a DAC is a smart move. When I see ads like this, it makes me wonder.
http://cgi.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cl.pl?dgtlconv&1330720449

http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/wyred4/dac.html

It seems like having a great DAC is the way to go for good digital, whether it's PC based or from a player. Maybe someone can advise about price points and likelihood of obsolescence. It's certainly not my area of expertise.

SteveRB

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #28 on: 4 Jan 2012, 04:19 pm »
Yeah. Dropping $1k on a DAC is substantial. In my statement above I'm thinking $1500 for computer, DAC and storage. This won't get you in the super high end but will get the ball rolling and leave room for future digital improvements as tech and prices change. After all this is the vinyl forum and that's where the quality experiences come from for me.

doug s.

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 6572
  • makin' music
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #29 on: 4 Jan 2012, 04:52 pm »
keep your eyes out for a used art di/o dac that has been modded.  use it w/the transport of your choice.  make sure you have separate isolation transformers for the transport and the dac itself.  (i'd recommend doing this regardless of which dac/transport you are using.  these isolation trannies are cheap if you shop ebay.)

the relatively ancient art di/o dac still stands up to the test of time.  and much more expensive digital gear.  i a-b'd mine against ~$2k to $8k digital systems, and the modest di/o easily held its own.  i admit the $8k rig is now pushing a couple years old, so maybe things have improved by leaps & bounds since then?  i doubt it...  other less worthy digital gear included alchemist, resolution audio, electrocompaniet.

i have an extra modded di/o that you can borrow if you wish; shipping should be cheap as these are small.  but, it is not f/s...   8)

holly hippodaze everyone!   :thumb:

doug s.

ps - regarding cd burning, i burned a copy of a (well recorded) patricia barbour cd on a standard computer, using a black blank cd - it sounded better than the original.  but, not as good as the winyl...   :wink:

Freo-1

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #30 on: 4 Jan 2012, 10:03 pm »
Yeah. Dropping $1k on a DAC is substantial. In my statement above I'm thinking $1500 for computer, DAC and storage. This won't get you in the super high end but will get the ball rolling and leave room for future digital improvements as tech and prices change. After all this is the vinyl forum and that's where the quality experiences come from for me.

That is why I mentioned the Modwright Oppo.  I compared the Modwright Oppo to the new Eastern Electric DAC Plus, and the Modwright Oppo actually sounds better overall.  Now, the EE DAC is a remarkable product, so the fact that the Modwright compares so well is a positive statement to both units.

SteveFord

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 6432
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #31 on: 5 Jan 2012, 12:49 am »
I agree that computers are the future for music storage and it's probably already here.
It took me forever to buy a CD player so it'll be a bit before I take the plunge into PC stuff.  I'll need to do some research as to how best to get my vinyl into digital storage other than CD-Rs and it'll give the medium some additional time to mature.
Vinyl for music, digital for convenience I think is how it will work out no matter what route I go.  If reel to reel tape was still being made I'd probably go that route and leave the 1s and 0s to the birdies. 

code4246

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 36
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #32 on: 8 Jan 2012, 03:30 am »
I have maybe 1000 CDs and CD-Rs and I like the convenience of CDs.
A shopping spree is coming up and I figure I can spend $1500 for a CD player.  Is there anything out there that will come close to a Well Tempered Classic with an Ortofon 2M Black or a 47 year old tube tuner?

Try a Quad 99CDP2 or the Elite replacement.
Great sound for not too much $$$

Another good, affordable CDP is the Audiolab 8200CD.



SteveFord

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 6432
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #33 on: 8 Jan 2012, 05:00 am »
Doug was kind enough to send me that art di/o to play with and it is a tremendous improvement over the stock Jolida but as he said, it's not vinyl.

I think that my next CD player/upgrade is going to be another turntable.
A tube FM tuner will be for convenience.

TheChairGuy

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #34 on: 8 Jan 2012, 04:10 pm »
Doug was kind enough to send me that art di/o to play with and it is a tremendous improvement over the stock Jolida but as he said, it's not vinyl.

I think that my next CD player/upgrade is going to be another turntable.
A tube FM tuner will be for convenience.

That's an interesting place you came out at, Steve :thumb:

What I've found regarding CD advances is that they're all uniformly pretty good these days...even the DVD/CD players under $60.  I'd take a recent $60 player over nearly any 10 year old (maybe even 7 year old) formerly pricey flagship player of yesteryear.  Digital gear prices seem to bear out the same for most buyers as the depreciation on digital gear is by-and-large the worst in audio. 

You generally get nowhere near your purchase price with digital gear a few years later because the newer players simply sound as good or better....and modding the older players is simply working inferior (older) guts to a higher level. Substitution of some parts seems no match for the general march of technology. 

Standalone CD players exhibit the lowest noise...so if the higher res formats hold no interest than go that route.  I'm not fond of outboard DAC's as the physical junctions themselves add noise, jitter and discontinuity to the proceedings (I don't like the clutter of too many boxes, either, but that has nothing to do with the music). I certainly haven't heard all the computer based systems out there, but each time I have I hear no better playback than some really nice standalone players.  Perhaps I'm not discriminating enough in musical refinement :scratch:

Personally, I think DVD-A is simply stellar (I have no idea if it's the higher bit rates or that the recordings were simply performed more carefully or mastered with more recent knowledge of digital techniques), but they sound good.  I'd like to investigate Blu-ray releases too and might end up with the Oppo 95 soon for this reason.

Buy some player, generally best with a linear (toroid / low leakage) transformer and putting an inexpensive isolation transformer on it is generally a ticket to digital excellence.  The isotranny likely is more beneficial as a wastegate for digital hash flowing back into your system than an outright 'clean' power source...but, it's a dang trick upgrade for digital gear. 

I also have found on 4 players now the benefits of the Dakiom Feedback Stabilizers.  I'm sure there's $2 of shit inside the $60-$120 devices, but it's an improvement in smoother sound for each player.  Interestingly, as time has marched on, each player has benefitted LESS from the addition of the Dakiom....which tells me some part of the ripening digital evolution is feedback stabilization anyhow.  The owner, Dr. Kim, writes crazy shit on Audiogon, but the damn things work for whatever the hell reason.  The RCA doo-dads work I should add, I haven't found benefit enough to notice with the speaker pigtail units they sell. 

I don't know how to describe it - you put one on and you like the music more.  You take it off and I'm less happy.  So, they stay on.

My last player is now 2-3years old...so it may be that the very newest players don't benefit at all from it. 

All the same, digital and vinyl have distinctively different sounds, now more alike than they ever were, but I cannot see how the twain will ever fully meet at the same place.  There just seems to be folks of every stripe that will choose one as good enough and stick with it. 

Me? - I like 'em both but have had no goosebump moments with anything but vinyl so far in my life :violin: Frankly, I'd LOVE to ditch vinyl - it's a big pain in my ane - but, it's the format that serves the music best and that's why I'm an audiophool since age 13 or so first smitten.
« Last Edit: 9 Jan 2012, 02:20 am by TheChairGuy »

Freo-1

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #35 on: 9 Jan 2012, 09:38 pm »
That's an interesting place you came out at, Steve :thumb:

What I've found regarding CD advances is that they're all uniformly pretty good these days...even the DVD/CD players under $60.  I'd take a recent $60 player over nearly any 10 year old (maybe even 7 year old) formerly pricey flagship player of yesteryear.  Digital gear prices seem to bear out the same for most buyers as the depreciation on digital gear is by-and-large the worst in audio. 

You generally get nowhere near your purchase price with digital gear a few years later because the newer players simply sound as good or better....and modding the older players is simply working inferior (older) guts to a higher level. Substitution of some parts seems no match for the general march of technology. 

Standalone CD players exhibit the lowest noise...so if the higher res formats hold no interest than go that route.  I'm not fond of outboard DAC's as the physical junctions themselves add noise, jitter and discontinuity to the proceedings (I don't like the clutter of too many boxes, either, but that has nothing to do with the music). I certainly haven't heard all the computer based systems out there, but each time I have I hear no better playback than some really nice standalone players.  Perhaps I'm not discriminating enough in musical refinement :scratch:

Personally, I think DVD-A is simply stellar (I have no idea if it's the higher bit rates or that the recordings were simply performed more carefully or mastered with more recent knowledge of digital techniques), but they sound good.  I'd like to investigate Blu-ray releases too and might end up with the Oppo 95 soon for this reason.

Buy some player, generally best with a linear (toroid / low leakage) transformer and putting an inexpensive isolation transformer on it is generally a ticket to digital excellence.  The isotranny likely is more beneficial as a wastegate for digital hash flowing back into your system than an outright 'clean' power source...but, it's a dang trick upgrade for digital gear. 

I also have found on 4 players now the benefits of the Dakiom Feedback Stabilizers.  I'm sure there's $2 of shit inside the $60-$120 devices, but it's an improvement in smoother sound for each player.  Interestingly, as time has marched on, each player has benefitted LESS from the addition of the Dakiom....which tells me some part of the ripening digital evolution is feedback stabilization anyhow.  The owner, Dr. Kim, writes crazy shit on Audiogon, but the damn things work for whatever the hell reason.  The RCA doo-dads work I should add, I haven't found benefit enough to notice with the speaker pigtail units they sell. 

I don't know how to describe it - you put one on and you like the music more.  You take it off and I'm less happy.  So, they stay on.

My last player is now 2-3years old...so it may be that the very newest players don't benefit at all from it. 

All the same, digital and vinyl have distinctively different sounds, now more alike than they ever were, but I cannot see how the twain will ever fully meet at the same place.  There just seems to be folks of every stripe that will choose one as good enough and stick with it. 

Me? - I like 'em both but have had no goosebump moments with anything but vinyl so far in my life :violin: Frankly, I'd LOVE to ditch vinyl - it's a big pain in my ane - but, it's the format that serves the music best and that's why I'm an audiophool since age 13 or so first smitten.


Then by all means, find someone who has a Modwright Oppo BD-95 tube upgrade, and give it a listen. 

Once you do, I would be shocked if you still prefer vinyl.  I just got my Oppo 95 back from Dan, hooked it all up, threw in my MIL SPEC tubes, and was absolutely floored.  The sound from the unit is every bit as good as any input source I've ever heard (CD/Vinyl/Reel to Reel), you name it.

SACD/DVD Audio that is well mastered really comes across like you are listing to the original source.  And here is the best part:

No noise, distortion, clicks, pops, cleaning of records, worry about record and cartridge alignment, and so on. 

All the arguments about digital sounding harsh or not right are more or less are rendered moot with this setup.  No time domain filter anomalies seem to be audible, and the analog stage is as good as it gets.  It’s not even broken in yet, and it’s already that good.

SteveFord

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 6432
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #36 on: 10 Jan 2012, 02:07 am »
I'm always willing to be proven wrong.
With digital sources I get up after a bit and end up doing something else; with vinyl my fat butt's glued to the chair.  Switching from CD over to a tuner made in 1964 makes a tremendous sonic improvement in my system.
Freo-1, are you anywhere near the wilds of the Commonwealth of Pennsyltucky?  I'll give a listen.

TheChairGuy

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #37 on: 10 Jan 2012, 02:33 am »
Freo-1,

I heard the Modwright Oppo 83 a year ago at the Rocky Mountain Musicfest (Fritzspeakers room) and it sounded superb

That said, if you smother digital with enough tubes it loses it's last vestiges of graininess.  Nonetheless, the Modwright option would be a possibility for me, as well, if I get the Oppo 95.

Thanks for chiming in  :thumb:

John

code4246

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 36
Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #38 on: 10 Jan 2012, 10:27 am »
That's an interesting place you came out at, Steve :thumb:

What I've found regarding CD advances is that they're all uniformly pretty good these days...even the DVD/CD players under $60.  I'd take a recent $60 player over nearly any 10 year old (maybe even 7 year old) formerly pricey flagship player of yesteryear.  Digital gear prices seem to bear out the same for most buyers as the depreciation on digital gear is by-and-large the worst in audio. 

Glad you said "nearly".

 :lol:

I'm in the opposite boat, I find nearly every cheap BD/DVD player unlistenable for music and would gladly take a 10 year old flagship.




Freo-1

Re: CD player advances?
« Reply #39 on: 10 Jan 2012, 11:12 am »
I'm always willing to be proven wrong.
With digital sources I get up after a bit and end up doing something else; with vinyl my fat butt's glued to the chair.  Switching from CD over to a tuner made in 1964 makes a tremendous sonic improvement in my system.
Freo-1, are you anywhere near the wilds of the Commonwealth of Pennsyltucky?  I'll give a listen.


Quote

Freo-1,

I heard the Modwright Oppo 83 a year ago at the Rocky Mountain Musicfest (Fritzspeakers room) and it sounded superb. 

That said, if you smother digital with enough tubes it loses it's last vestiges of graininess.  Nonetheless, the Modwright option would be a possibility for me, as well, if I get the Oppo 95.

Thanks for chiming in 

John




Until I heard this player for myself, I would have never believed that digital could sound this good.  I was listening to a CD that I thought I knew inside and out, and was astounded to hear new details that I did not know were there before.  The individual instruments were able to be discerned, whereas before it sounded like one set.  The timbres from the strings sounded natural.  The low level detail easily exceeds any vinyl playback setup I've ever heard before, and without any noise. 

The Modwright Oppo makes the entire playback chain sound better, almost like an upgrade of the system as a whole.  The preamp, amp, and speakers all seem to improve with the use of this player.