0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 13462 times.
You got me putting quotes on "biggest".
Sorry guys, but he did ask "biggest" and simple physics indicates line array. It's really not even a close call. Horizontal directivity issues apply the same as they do for point sources. Of course arrays aren't without their compromises with the primary ones being distortion in the size of the image and driver costs to do it right. No other speaker fills a room with sound more evenly, whether it's an arena or home listening room, and they're as different from point source speakers as open baffle speakers are from boxes.
Large sweet spot invites room interaction issues/challenges (translate problems) and in my experience a lack of imaging definition. Size of sweet spot is only an upper midrange and higher phenom where first room reflections come into play. The omni or dipole radiators produce a blob or wall or sound, which is more natural than you might think, but precise imaging (the very hallmark of stereo and IMO the premise for entry into audiophile-dom) is lost. And of course trying to achieve a large sweet spot in a small room is an excerise in fustration.Personally if I'm listening seriously, I'm happy to be doing it from "the" chair where images (with the right recordings) lock into place, especially under nearfield conditions. And if I'm just listening casually the high frequency roll off and loss of imaging are acceptable.
Tony, I'd only caution that I think that Shahinians only sound better than average when playing classical music or maybe light jazz. I find them to be very quirky, even problematic with their tonal balance and so buying them sound unheard is very sketchy. Mirage omnipolars are probably safer. Also, I find that Shahinians fetch surprisingly high prices so aren't generally a great used value if you're not a Shahiniac. IOW, the following for them is fervent, but very small.