0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 29294 times.
I think that most of the claims of "limited dynamics" have more to do with the amplifier than the receptacle that they're plugged into. Pass Labs is one good example of that. Most of his amplifiers have trouble driving a realistic load in the first place.
Yes, but if the amp is struggling already, why blame the power conditioner?
My point is that many people already have an amplifier that is insufficient for the system they have created, and so by cleaning up the system with a conditioner it only highlights the problem of limited dynamics.I think some people expect too much magic from a power conditioner.
(1) Can someone explain in layman's terms how an 1800 watt power conditioner would limit the current (and I assume "dynamics") to a system that draws only 3 or 4 hundred watts? How about 6 hundred?(2) Can someone explain in laymen's terms how a parallel power conditioner would do the same for any system?
Make mine (cheap) red wine! I missed your earlier response (and werd's) in this fast running topic....welcome back from Munich (I was in Cologne last month - first time - good town)I misspoke earlier - I do use an active conditioner that I found to only help matters without grain or etch added - the Adept Response product (I use the AR1p powering the whole outlet strip that everything but my digital gear gets plugged into). On the strip I use a ENACOM filter, too, and a PS Audio Noise Harvester in an adjacent outlet (it's a very small, nuanced difference I hear with it, but when removed I enjoy the music a bit less - even if I still can't determine what it's doing)3+ years ago I had a LOT more time in my life to monkey around with my system, so each and every piece of power conditioning was tested here. I work all day in my home office and that's where my system is...so if there is etch added it will grate on me pretty fast while in here 8-10 hours daily. What I meant earlier is that I have yet to find a transformer-based noise 'conditioner' that was a net positive for anything but digital gear. As mentioned, on the digital side, I use a small isolation transformer that is likely most effective at being a wastegate for digital pollutants getting tossed back into the system than anything else. I'm not at all certain that it makes the juice going to the digital side 'better' so much as restrict digital artifacts back in. Nonetheless, it's a pretty substantial net gain in better sonics going that way.
It does make me wonder how close the transformer feeding the electical service into your house will make a difference?. Having a transformer fitted conditioner powering your hifi might be more beneficial if the neighborhood service transfomer is hundreds of feet away. Compared to a guy living next door to it.
I get what you are saying though. If the amp isn't up to snuff feeding decent power isn't going to help.
We see big huge transformers feeding massive farad storage. All this points to bandaid design relating to power issues from the wall IMHO. So if you can get a very fast reliable power feed from your wall then it reduces the strain of your amps.
I think all amps will benefit from over kill including SET output. You want that fast 50 amp spikes in dynamic push to be un-impeded.
(1) It is not power handling capacity that matters. It is the design of the conditioner itself. Many many power conditioners employed tons of active devices IN SERIES to do the active filtering. Such active filtering networks look gorgeous on blue prints, but so often fail to react spontaneously to load changes. Good ears can detect such pitfalls in term of compression & restricted dynamics.
FYI, what I've installed in my 125V & 250V dedicated powerlines for many years are simple basic linear inline RFI filters, made in England, with insertion loss of 52dB at 32MHz. They work without affect a bit of the music & are very affordable.
(2) Do you mean 2 conditioners connected in parallel to power same one load ?
(1) Can you list a few of these conditioners that operate this way? (2) "Inline", isn't that the same as in series? If not, please explain the difference.(3) Parallel filtering is where the cleaning or "conditioning" action is in parallel with the hot line, not in series with it. At least that is the way that I understand it. Do I have that wrong too?
I don't get it.
You really need to make that visit we've been discussing...I'll give you a very convincing demo on the merit of high quality power conditioning. Then we can go drink beer!