I don't think the climb would be worth the view.
I have no doubt that Danny can and probably has done it but supporting it via DIY would be a nightmare.
At the end what does all the added complexity give you over a standard kit? It's not like the current offerings have hard to drive impedance swings?
For that kind of money you could build a Neo1 with a Peachtree audio product and be sitting pretty for desktp life! Heck you could even add one of Dannys entry subs under the desk.
No offense just a different view.
Kind Regards
Robert
Fair question. It comes down to a whether or not one believes there may be inherent advantages in an active crossover vs a passive crossover. If the answer is no there should be not interest in making such a product.
If there are benefits to an active crossover design then there is a market opportunity. However to maximize the benefit to Danny and customers, a slightly different approach might be required. That might perhaps mean that active crossovers and electronics boards should come pre-built and pre-tested. This would greatly reduce the complexity of assembly.
Or perhaps starting with a pre-existing studio monitor (KRK, Mackie, Alesis, etc) and supplying a modification kit for it to make it more appropriate for audiophile use.