Or put cement blocks under your chair. 
I had actually done something similar when I thought it was needed
.

I guess a better solution would be to angle the tweeter down some at its mount on the V60 to hit the same sweet spot.
I think you'll find that you won't need to adjust your listening height, but you may need to "slightly" adjust the "balance" between the tweeter and the panels.
You'll notice that VMPS speakers "don't" rely or suggest that the tweeter be at ear level. In fact each design is slightly different with only the RM40 and the RM v60 set up in a "balanced" line.
We did have the RM/x with the Free Swinging Tweeter (FST) that DID have a vertical convergence angle, but you never heard that the highs sounded like they were coming from over 6 feet high. In fact the soundstage height was virtually the same as the RM40 and RM v60. (depending on your listening distance)
Having significant experience with the 626R, the RM30, the RM2 has shown me that excellent results can be achieved with the tweeter significantly above or below the ear. (this is true to a lesser degree with the Spiral Ribbon which has slightly reduced vertical dispersion)
The RM30 High Boy Tweek was actually the most telling example of this where the tweeter was approaching a foot above the ear, and highs were perfectly integrated.
Also in my RM40s, the tweeter is well below my ear, yet the highs are wll distributed to my listening height (I'm 6'3")
I think it has to do with 1) The general vertical dispersion of the specific tweeter, and 2) the enhancement to that dispersion via the "line array effect".
All these comments are relating to the speaker "without" CDWG. If you use the CDWG then the directivity and dispersion charachter of the tweeter is enhanced even further.
So I think you can put away the jackhammers and cement blocks

A few quick adjustments to the L-Pads or the D-OXO and you should be just fine.
