I think this forum related matter is like this:
On some sites there may be Bryston product users, and if they are active dudes, eventually
they will post about their acquisitions - if people ask questions, and such.
So, eventually someone posts a fault, now the good thing here, as displayed by the mail you got
Mr Tanner, is that it really is up to each customer to check out the necessary specs to see if a component will
work.
One might have pre-determined set of requirements that one is hunting for, and a totally wrong set of spec on a forum
could make for a quick decision to go elsewhere, and one will miss out on a more precise picture... as it were.
How to combat such a scenario...
I think the important angle for a customer buying Bryston is that it has a good reputation( promise of good sound) and a very long
warranty period...
---
If the wrong specs won't cause a direct systems failure or a "problem" technically...(a direct electrical missmatch..) when one auditions the Bryston product in the system in question - the system the user asking for said specs... has - when getting the wrong specs told on a forum... then there is no reason I think, to post a correction.
The reason for this is simple, eventually a customer will arrive at the product he or she was aiming for, one way or the other.
The focus, I think is to defend the basic values one wants the product to be known for, and that a customer can attest to the truth given by using a product and it indeed works as advertised, if you may - and then writes about it, on say a forum...
This then, proof of the pudding, would suffice.
Wrong posts be damned, let them sail their own seas, eventually they won't float anyones boat anyway.
Imperial