0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 8129 times.
Quote from: Pez on 17 May 2007, 04:34 pmWhat I was told if you are needing to run more graphics intensive programs parallels is not a viable option though. Why would the PC environment be used for graphics intensive programs? Gaming?
What I was told if you are needing to run more graphics intensive programs parallels is not a viable option though.
Fine I'll say it! I wanna play Half Life 2!!!
I think the "bad gaming machine" stigma is slowly disappearing for macs. Realistically they perform very well when compared with the equivalent PC. But lets face it, the real problem is the software itself. My Mac plays WoW extremely well. Better than my old PC could ever hope to. Plus I can multitask while playing the game without any detriment to playability, at least from what I can tell. What the big problem is the lack of software and poorly integrated software that is currently available. If the software is good then you can play anything you want on a mac a PC can.
I have been produce monthly magazines since 1988 (I have also produced hundreds of comic books!) on Windows PC’s starting with Windows 3.0 using Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator and Aldus Page Maker.I have also been producing broadcast video with Adobe Premier and Pinnacle products under Windows for many years. Additionally I produce websites and interactive products (including Kiosks) with Macromedia wares under Windows for more then a decade now. I have been using my Windows computers for listening, managing and editing audio for over a decade.
Who says you need a Mac to do cool stuff like, you know iLife stuff – LOL!!!!
I also have a question for Vista users. One of the things I love about OSX vs XP is that out of the box, OSX can read/open EPS, PDF, .AI, .PSD, .PS files and more graphics/publishing file types. No downloads/installations of any kind. XP could not do that, is Vista the same way?
Just for good natured debate (I do, for a living, and have done many of the same things you have), a good argument would be that iLife does a huge percentage of what the pieces of software you menioned can do. The difference is price and ease of use. Your programs (and mine, etc) are specialized, highly complicated programs that cost well over $1500 to purchase new. iLife is extremely easy for most people to use, and costs something like $120, or is free with consumer level Macs.
Well, you've just gotta go hang out in the Apple store parking lot and wait to get socked in the mouth then maybe they'll give you a copy!