[Woodsea]

Those are macho surrounds, ain't for no pussy's
I am such a pussy, actually poor
Would love to have them since I know how good they would sound
So I guess the RM30's w/ new sub, an LRC and these babies are the bomb for the almost ultimate HT.  Where as 5 RM/X's would be the uber HT speaker system.  
Looking good-Brian
-Eric

[cametz]

Bubba
How do you get a pic in the post?
CAM

[JoshK]

Cametz,

like this...

Code: [Select]

[img]http://url[/img]

[cametz]

Joshk
You saying that the pic has to be on the web (URL). Can't I post pics from my computer file?
CAM[/img]

[JoshK]

nope

[Marbles]

Cametz, go to the Gallery section and open a gallery.  Upload your pics from your computer to your audiocircle gallery, then post the pics per Josh's directions.

[RobertR]

I still want to know more about this item.  What is the driver complement (number, size, composition, etc.)?   What's the frequency response?   Are the ribbons angled as a 45 degree angle to the woofer "box"?   Why is it usually shown laying in its "side"?

[John Casler]

I still want to know more about this item.  What is the driver complement (number, size, composition, etc.)?   What's the frequency response?   Are the ribbons angled as a 45 degree angle to the woofer "box"?   Why is it usually shown laying in its "side"?

Hi Robert,

Sorry I missed your post here and can only answer part of it.

As far as the speaker compliment for the DIPOLE, it is (in its basic form) 2 spiral ribbons, 2 neopanels, and a single 6.5 inch WCF (megawoofer).

The one I ordered for my client had the FST upgrade as shown.

Although I doubt if it has been measured, I would place the frequency response as roughly similar to a 626R since it shares the same drivers.

I think it is shown laying on its side because the the owner wanted to show its size in comparison to the LRC.

This is a good sized speaker and not small like most other Dipoles.

I am not sure of the angular divergence and maybe Brian could answer that.

[RobertR]

Thanks John!