0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 220464 times.
I'm one of the minority who think the whole "maggies have to be out in the middle of the room" is BS. It's a "nice to have" not "must have". Same with "Maggie's need hundreds of watts of power". Again - nice to have not must. If you do have them close to a rear wall use some absorption behind to address excessive back slap of sound messing up sound coming from front. Same holds true for other dipole planars. I've purposefully used sloppy language to describe this. I've been a bit disappointed with mmg-w and CC's. They just don't extend down enough in the low frequency even for surround duty and much less for CC duty. Yes - you get the wrap around dipole affect which is nice. But because the LF is so lacking the receiver / pre pro sets the crossover point too high (like 200hz) and then your sub starts trying to play it back (bad). You end up having to manually set the crossover point on the surround lower to compensate or else you get this muffled dialogue coming out of the sub. So I would echo SF that for side surrounds use MMGs full size on diy hinges. This what I do though it takes some work and they are big. For rear surrounds I have compromised with MMG-Ws. Still a lot of material that's not native 7.1. Its more for fill in effect so I dont sweat it as much. The Maggie CCs have been the biggest disappointment. Adding the DMW is kludgy. And adding the cost of that ANd CC5 gets expensive. If you have the space I'd recommend the MMG on its side. I tired that once (before using it for side surround) and it was the best by far. Even if you only use one it's still only $600 a pair. You could probably resell the other to someone else who wants to do the same. Continuing with my CC rant - Maggie's are so revealing that I'm finding often on programs the CC sound is so badly recorded that I think my CC is broken. Distorted / honky / etc. Sometimes even within the same blu ray movie - good / bad / good. What I've come to realize is that it's not the speaker but the recording. The MMG is in some ways "warmer" than the QR based CC5 so it's actually more forgiving. I would look at placing absorption behind it though as it's not practical often to place a CC too far out.
A crowded demo in a hotel room is not the equal to a private audition with your music, sitting in the sweet spot and listening at your leisure.
Truer words were never spoken. Meanwhile I have a question: which models can still be sent back to the factory for refurbishment? I can't afford new ones and am leery of the complexity of Maggies when it comes to repair and maintenance. But the prospect of having the experts attend to them is enticing indeed. ThxPS: I'm an architect and I'd like to design better stands/feet for the 1.7
That would be a very expensive proposition for me as I'd need another VTL amp and another 3.7 plus the Bryston piece.I have thought about it, though.
Find somebody else doing the same thing and split a pair, same with the amp.
You want to saw the amp in half? I wonder how feasible it is to do that (find someone doing the same thing, that is).
Dual mono amps, ya big silly.