0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 398695 times.
GB,Maybe this can help you get there sooner. User reports say this is every bit as good as a 16.5. http://www.canuckaudiomart.com/details/649240538-canadian-made-rcm-3d-printed-parts-you-supply-the-shopvac/The wand will accommodate 2 sizes of vac hose and has a pressure release valve to adjust suction.neo
YOU!!! You just had to push me over the edge. Well after watching a video or two I have ordered one too. It was tough to choose between this and the Record Doctor, but I like the fact that I can easily replace the vacuum if it dies. Now I am ordering supplies to make the DIY cleaning solution on AK. I will watch my step on the "Audio slide" around you.
In case you didn't recognize her with the er, hair that way, the new avatar is Scarlett Johansson. I'd rather listen to those old jazz guys, and look at something pleasing in a different way.According to VE the nulls for the 507 II are 60.1 and 116.6mm. That puts the inner null next to Stevenson at the lead out, and the outer null is Loefgren. This should optimize the middle and end of the record.Hey Smctigue,Get a chance to check out more carts? We'd be interested in your thoughts.neo
My advise is.......Don't do this! I've owned my Rock 3 for almost 20 yrs. I've tried quite a few arms and carts on it. The front end dampending, along with the built-in seismic sink, are the main elements that make it sound sooooo good. The silicone trough will elevate the performance of a pedestrian arm such that it performs beyond its price point.On the Rock I have used what I guess are considered medium mass arms: Rega 300B, SME V, Linn Ittok, Linn Basic, Kuzma Stogi, Kuzma Stogi Reference, Clearaudio Satisfy. Combined with mostly MM carts in the medium compliance range: CA Virtuoso Wood, CA Maestro, Cartridge Man Music Maker mk3, SAE 1000e. Also used some MC: Dyna 17d2 mk2 and Dyna 20x (both LO and HO). Every combination I tried has worked just fine.
I bought my Rock in '95. It's been my one and only table since. I've never run it without the outrigger in place. Not using never really crossed my mind until I starting playing with these vintage MM's. I have been thinking about a much lighter solution to the Townshend outrigger that should accomplish the same thing without adding 5 grams to the arm.
My original question only applies to my current arm. Do the damping benefits of adding the 5 gram outrigger to the arm outweigh the pitfalls of running a 25cu cart on a 17 gram arm? My tests have shown me that 17 grams is just too much for the carts that I am testing, they sound sluggish. The arm without the outrigger sounds much better but I think its more a question of mass then the effectiveness of the damping. Now, if I put the outrigger on a 7 gram arm I'll be in good shape.
OK, so your own ears have answered that question. I don't believe it's the dampening that's hurting things. As you've correctly surmised, I think the cart is just a bad match with the Rega arm made heavier w/ outrigger hardware. Removing the outrigger lightens the arm, and makes for a better match.So the vintage cart on Rega is better without the trough, but is it better than your other carts with the trough?I've seen your list (Benz, Dyna, Shelter). Some really nice ones there that should sound great on Rega + trough (unless there is some cart / arm synergy or matching issue I'm unware of).But if IIRC, aren't they are all MC? Maybe you like the vintage MM so much not because it's vintage, but because it's MM? Just a thought. Many folks prefer MM. Have you tried a more recent MM? Most of the carts I own (see earlier post) are current MM, and on Rega they should all be just fine w/r/t RF. So you'd be able to use dampening trough. I prefer them all (including both Dyna 20x versions) to the Dyna 17d2 MC, which sounds a bit wirey and lean to me.
I prefer my MM's without the trough to my MC's using the trough, absolutely. I am going to engineer an outrigger that will be under a gram and try it with the MM's that I have. I expect good things. I haven't tried any of the modern MM's yet, not sure I will anytime soon. I am very happy with what I have right now. I like your description of the 17d2, that is exactly how I would descibe the d3 although it does seem to be a widely acclaimed cartridge.
I prefer my MM's without the trough to my MC's using the trough, absolutely. I am going to engineer an outrigger that will be under a gram and try it with the MM's that I have. I expect good things. I haven't tried any of the modern MM's yet, not sure I will anytime soon. I am very happy with what I have right now.
Sorry man. You're right. But the guy lies and attacks me like that, I'm gonna say my piece and set the record straight.I've said what I needed to. Cease and desist time. Unless he lies and attacks again!
I look at the top of the page (67) and I see this. You've said your peace and I'll say mine. ....... (blah, blah, blah.......and more nonsense)