Back to the reductionist sound bites: 'science', 'voodoo', blah blah blah. Isn't 'science'(tm) required for any competent crossover design? Or does Danny stick needles in a jobu to make them work?
It goes much deeper than that with the flat earthers. Back around 2001 a friend of mine did a test on my power cables and their effect on musical samples and measured differences in the waveforms of the samples. These tests used the source file as a subject and control and comparison in a DAW. Frame to frame, bit accurate synching was done to insure that their was no time slippage in the digital editing system that was used. There were easily visible and mathmatically quantifiable differences between the samples. Pretty much a no brainer. The result? Jan was accused of poor methodology (mostly by people without a clue as to the accuracy of modern digital editors) and of falsifying the data.
The flat earth, meter readers will ALWAYS find a problem with a test that offers proof that they are or even could be wrong. Far beit for them to ever actually
try something and experiment to see (or hear) for themselves. It is much easier for them to be lazy and do nothing and certainly greater self indulgent ego gratification is achieved by calling others stupid or delusional. Elitists of every kind fall into this mindset. They are smarter than anyone else and they attempt to prove it by humiliating, degradating and slandering anyone with an opposing POV. That is why most of people with a brain don't frequent some sites on the 'net.
I like Audio Circle. There are people here that actually DO things
Dave
