0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 310387 times.
No Dan that would be me The cabinets are finished and painted / lacquered. I'll post some pics at some point. The crossovers are next, just deciding how exotic to go when choosing the components. (I'd welcome comments on this - I read somewhere that Anand seriously upgraded the XOs - Anand?)
... My advice? Listen to it stock first. Make sure your entire system with subs is fully optimized. And then, if you are truly wanting to dump $$$...go ahead.
I've enjoyed reading all the great feedback, but still don't have a handle on how far from the backwall the Abbeys must/should be....and how critical. I have maybe 22"before it becomes an issue. Thoughts?
Jason now that you've had some time with them were they worth the wait? and I mean that honestly not trying to smart or anything I just noticed the thread again and was wondering how your liking them??an aside--I got some Sleek Audio SA-1 IEM's...now I understand..LOL
Nope--I haven't read the whole thread, did I miss something??
Sorry guys about my previous comments. There's was a line a couldn't see for some reason.About your measurements. I think they look very good over all. They're far from outstanding. You do have a difference of about 27 dB in the frequency response. I know that's unsmoothed and that your room isn't heavily treated. I've seen unsmoothed graphs with only 5 dB of deviation, but that's been rooms with large amounts of treatment. Very difficult to get something like that in a living room.The impulse response doesn't tell me very much, though it looks good from what I can see. I'm not used to read the graph in Holm Impulse. An ETC graph shows reflections a more readible way, but it's not important. The spike at about 5ms and 7ms is something you can probably easily address.I'ver ordered a pair Abbey, Harpers and two bandpass subs myself. Looking forward to it.
Per your request, here is my room. I have an ADS Sat7 Sub12 setup from 1992(with Frogdesign stands). I trying to see if upgrading is worth it and feasible. I'm thinking about Abbeys or the Emerald Physics C3, and keeping my sub. The sub's specs are 15--100Hz, < 1% THD, 350 watt amp with 12" cone. I have no idea if it would be called a "quick" sub. I do love its volume control. My listening chair is about 10' from equipment. I don't want to be bothered by having to move the speakers each time I listen. Thanks.
Great! I look forward to your whole thread with measurements and learning what I did wrong.
Not saying you did something wrong. Just stating that there are rooms fro improvements.
I suppose you have measurements for your room, so are you going to post them? I'm always willing to learn. I think that every day that passes without a new nugget of wisdom is a bad day. Dave
jtwrace told me not to and I will respect that.
And what's the point?Seems like people are getting upset because I'm not following the stream and saying the measurements are great. It all depends what it's compared to. Compared to many typical box speakers in the marked, they measure very good. Compared to better speakers, rooms with more treatment, or bigger rooms, the measurements are more average.
There are also many ways to show measurements. In Holm Impluse everything is zoomed out. Show the same measurement in REW and it will look very different.
Wrong! Read my post above. It cleary says that I look forward to your posting a new thread about your setup.
No not upset at all. In fact, you are entitled to your opionions and thoughts as anyone is on this site. "Better" speakers is subjective.You're kidding me right? Do you not realize that there is scaling on the X and Y axis? It doesn't make a difference whatsoever. Look at the scaling and if it's the same as any other program it doesn't make a difference. Data is Data
When do your Abbeys, Harpers and subs arrive? Why are buying Abbeys if you think there are better speakers?