0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 6539 times.
I'm with you Kevin and Ethan, very well presented. I’ll ignore the feedback debate, but it’s all spot on with me.What makes a particular speaker design active is having one power amp channel connected directly to each driver, period. Forget about where the amp located and instead make sure the crossover is wired between the preamp/source and the amps.The primary advantage of active design is that without a crossover "blocking the view" of the driver, the amp can not only more easily respond to the reactive load, but with only one driver in play the load is inherently less complex and again easier to respond to.
That being said, Paradigm gave up trying to sell the Actives due to consumer perceptions against active design and not being able to load up their equipment rack with trophies they had "hunted". And rumor has it that these suffered from some of the same reliability issues mentioned above for the cheaper designs.
Another reason against the use of active monitors in the consumer world, is just the logistics of running power to each speaker. Can lead to very bad WAF. They tend to work much better in a custom install, where you can plan for such things - which is a small share of the market.
I love the idea of active monitors. It has the potential to sound awesome while really simplifying things....you don't even have to think about amplification after the initial purchase is made. -Jim
Absolutely! You can actually hear the speakers as the designer wanted (mostly...obviously that individual doesn't control the room or other factors).-Jim
Would you guys stop? I'm trying to resist buying active monitors.Dan
As Locutus of Borg said, "Resistance is futile". I have often wondered what these JBL active studio monitors with Room Correction might bring to the table in the average home setting. JBL LSR4328 (MSRP: $1850/pair, Street price: ~ $1450)http://www.jblpro.com/catalog/General/ProductFamily.aspx?FId=7&MId=5 Steve