0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 11998 times.
I think the volume controls in the DAC/Pre and STE Pre will be quite transparent to the source. Of much greater concern is the output stage of the DAC/Pre being comparable to the STE Pre. The STE Pre is a pretty serious attempt at building a very good buffer/pre with very little in the way of compromises. My money is on it having a superior ability deliver the goods sonically. It should have a bigger power supply and a more robust output stage than the DAC/Pre. It is not a compromise product that is trying to do two things at once. If you are serious about doing business with Wryd4S,then you should discuss the pros and cons of the two products with them. The glowing review by 6moons indicates the STE Pre runs in very fast company and is seriously under priced for the performance it delivers.
Pete,None of these options is tubey enough. Here's my suggestion.Pick up the ridiculously priced DeHavilland Ultraverve pre-amp that somebody is listing here.Pick up the ridiculously priced Music Reference RM10 that somebody is listing here.Pick up an additional Music Reference RM10 somewhere.Run the Music Reference RM10s as monoblocks.Also get the Tranquility DAC.Actually, I'm half tempted to sell most of my stuff and get the Ultraverve and the RM10 myself.Chad
The STP Preamp is a "passive/active" design that runs "passive" (actually buffered), then switches to active (8dB gain) as the volume is increased. As far as I know, the DAC-2 does not provide any gain. Steve
Scotty, once again, great insights.How do you guys feel about an all solid state system with say a Wyred STE pre, a Wyred or Tranquility DAC, even the EE DAC, and Cherry amp?? If I'm not going to get any gain out of the Dodd buffer, then I might need a true preamp, expecially if the DAC/Pre combos are compromises.
If I'm not going to get any gain out of the Dodd buffer, then I might need a true preamp, expecially if the DAC/Pre combos are compromises.
My internet is out at the house so could not respond sooner. Yes, I need tubes in the system for sure and it probably makes more sense to have a tube pre than a ss pre and tubed dac, correct? I'm laser focused on the Cherry amps though. When I had the 4800A I really liked that thing and it's one of the few components I want back in my system.I am trying to spend as little as possible and even willing to go without remote volume control in the pre. Anyone ever use a Belles pre? I have used his amps only. Edit: no truly balanced per Soundstage review, so probably out of consideration. Also have high gain which could cause hissssss.Edit: I'd like to get a preamp with true balanced outputs since the Cherry amps are balanced only and I'd like to take advantage of that.
BAT VK-51http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?preatube&1276180422&/Bat-Tube-Pre-VK-5i-Pre-Amp-upg
I've conversed with him and he is a straight shooter. I'm going to think on it over the AKFest show. This model, while 10 years old, looks like it is a classic with the accolades it has received and the technology inside it. I'm not sure the newer models have necessarily improved over it from what I can read. So yeah, I have my eye on it Shep.