0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 1084641 times.
Thank you, Jtwrace. But as I mentioned, I read the original poster's comments. I also read Pardales's post where he said he preferred the Miniwatt, and mjosef's post where he said he preferred the Exposure 2010S (a class AB solid state amp). The other comparisons, as I recall, were to mass-market receivers. Thus, I'd like to hear more, particularly comparisons to decent audiophile amps rather than mass-market stuff. My head may be spinning, but I'm still thinking clearly. Thank you again for your reply, and I'm grateful for all of your work on the case--I may be getting one for this amp if I hear some more specifics.
Looking for suggestion on which model/configuration to get. Currently have a Gallo 3.1 and also planning on acquiring the Magnepan 1.7...
Here's some information that might help. I asked about the SDS-258's ability to drive a four ohm load, and here's the response I received: "The SDS-258 can run most 4 ohm speakers with no problems at all, but a few people have had trouble a few times with electrostatic types that drop to below 1 ohm. Most 4 ohm speakers do not drop this low and pose no problems for this amp. The power does not double into 4 ohms though due to current limiting and protection circuitry. The SDS-254 is better suited to speaker systems that prove a hard load to drive".On the basis of this information I ordered the SDS-254 kit to drive my 2.5-way speakers that dip below four ohms. The rationale for this decision is 1) The SDS series are their best product, 2) The SDS-254 offers more versatility for driving a wide range of speakers, and 3) I save a few dollars by ordering the 254 instead of the 258.
I am NOT a DIYer but looks like with Tom's modules it is pretty much plug-and-play. But, it's not difficult to assemble, and you'll get plenty of help here.However, the SDS-254, is 250wpc @4 ohms. I am not sure sonically which one would be a better choice.
As discussed previously, the Class D amp is in kit form and NOT plug & play. The SDS-254 is a very popular choice and one I wouldn't hesitate to recommend.Once again, the Class D amp is an incredible buy, and the SDS-254 would be a good choice.
I might have exaggerated a little I meant relatively easier than other available kits on the market. It is funny, Tom actually said SDS-258 first. Then after I sent my speakers info, he said SDS-254 but he said he meant the 258. Maybe he has his heart set on the 254. Do you recommend the 254 because it sounds better than the 258 or you mean it would be enough for my speakers? Thanks Roy!
Would I look stupid if I asked what is buffer? I have been seeing people talk about it but I am not sure if I know exactly what it does as opposed to preamp. Basically, it does the same thing as the preamp but in a different way?I also asked Tom about the choice of a module. What do you think???-----------------------------------------------------------------Would I be better off buying two SDS-254 modules and bridge them for 500X1 @8 ohms or buying one SDS-258 would be a better choice? I think 254 can do lower impedance better than 258, correct? Going with the 258 would give me only 50wpc more power vs. 254 @4 ohms, correct?He responded:Yes, the SDS-254 X 2 bridged is a great choice. This would be allot more power then you’ll ever need. Tom
As an FYI if you use my case you can go with one amp board and add the second later if you wish. ALL the holes are already there. Just a thought.