DSLRs and WYSIWYG

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 6164 times.

SET Man

Re: DSLRs and WYSIWYG
« Reply #20 on: 16 Jan 2010, 05:32 am »
Hey!

    Talking about FF vs smaller sensor. As for advantage with smaller sensor from what I've heard over the year is that...

1. You increase the long end of the lens.
2. In case of using FF lens, you only use the center image of the image circle of which is sharper than near the edge of the image circle of the lens.

   Disadvantage...

1. Loosing the Wide end.
2. Force me to think a bit differently with the crop factor and all.

   Anyway, personally I do missed having the wide end in FF. Of course if you are into shooting bird and such this wouldn't be problem.

   With that, my next DSLR will be FF for sure so I could get back to what I'm used to. :D Hope the price of FF DSLR will come down a bit more by than  :icon_lol:

Take care,
Buddy :thumb:

WerTicus

Re: DSLRs and WYSIWYG
« Reply #21 on: 26 Jan 2010, 09:05 am »
Id thought id throw this in the ring, even though I don't fully understand this myself but some guy from Sweden has some maths to say that the low noise benefit of a full frame vs crop sensor is zero.

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/71896-low-noise-benefit-ff-vs-aps-c-equals-zero.html

My understanding of this is that to get the same depth of field on a 35mm full frame format, with equal field of view, shutter speed and DOF you need a higher f stop, and to compensate you need higher iso, so the advantage of the larger frame is then lost.

JohnR

Re: DSLRs and WYSIWYG
« Reply #22 on: 26 Jan 2010, 09:55 am »
The ability to produce less DoF is usually considered an advantage. Otherwise, we would all be shooting compacts.

drphoto

Re: DSLRs and WYSIWYG
« Reply #23 on: 9 Feb 2010, 09:14 pm »
There was a question regarding composition. The common organizing principle is to use something called the 'rule of thirds', where you divide the viewfinder into an imaginary tic-tac-toe grid. (or you can do it in reality, if your camera has interchangeable view screens. All of my cameras have grid screens in them)

You start placing objects of interest along the grid lines, or at the intersection points. For example, a city skyline shot. Instead of parking the horizon line in the middle of the frame, put it along the lower 1/3 grid line, and let the sky take the remaining 2/3, particularly if the sky is pretty. Waterfront? maybe reverse it, put the horizon at the top and let the water and the reflections take up the lower 2/3.

In a portrait, the eyes are generally the center of interest, and as such can be placed at one of the upper intersection points.

Start thinking about lines. Diagonals are interesting. They lead the viewers eye into the scene.

A guy named Alain Briot, has a lesson on this, posted at the luminous-landscape.com website.

DOF in practical terms is a function of magnification, distance of lens to subject and f-stop. The larger the sensor (or film) the more magnification required, so less DOF. That's why when we used to shoot 8x10 cameras in the studio, we were often running an f-stop of 64, which required massive amounts of flash power.
« Last Edit: 9 Feb 2010, 10:18 pm by drphoto »