0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 64788 times.
Greetings,I was doing a little google research on the acoustic art system and acoustic resonators in general after trying them in my system and found your user group. Before I share my experience let me just say I've found a lot of information regarding the use or acoustic resonators for tuning everything from room acoustics to musical instruments to car exhausts. Snarky comments aside, a little research yeilds a wealth of information- try googleing "Acoustic Resonator".Now for my experience. Prior to auditioning the Acoustic ART system my room was filled with ASC Tube traps and various panel absorbers from different manufacturers including some ancient tuning pillows from Michael Green. The fact is if I had not recently tied the knot, I would have never tried these in my system. My wife hated my room acoustics (though she never said so while we were dating) so after the honeymoon ended, out went over 10k worth of room tuning. This transformed my system from what I had thought was great sounding to, well let's just it sounds like, you get the idea. While at RMAF I first heard the Acoustic ART system and was blown away- I bought a complete set there on the spot. The improvements I heard at RMAF when the acoustic resonators were in the system was a significant increase in overall sound staging and a dramatic improvement in bass extension and control- no kidding. When I got them home they improved my system but not to the same degree as what I heard at the show. It was not until a few weeks later when the Synergistic web site went live with install instructions did I get evertying I heard at RMAF and then some. I have been an audiophile for over 30 years and this has created as significant an improvement as anything I have added to my system. In fact, my system sounds much more holographic with better low frequencies now then it did with my old room treatments.Anyone who is skeptical should first audition a set before passing judgement and this is why I posted here. I would hate to see such a significant new product brought down by a bunch of ill informed nay sayers, or by competing manufacturers.
Greetings,I was doing a little google research on the acoustic art system and acoustic resonators in general after trying them in my system and found your user group. Before I share my experience let me just say I've found a lot of information regarding the use or acoustic resonators for tuning everything from room acoustics to musical instruments to car exhausts. Snarky comments aside, a little research yeilds a wealth of information- try googleing "Acoustic Resonator".Now for my experience. Prior to auditioning the Acoustic ART system my room was filled with ASC Tube traps and various panel absorbers from different manufacturers including some ancient tuning pillows from Michael Green. The fact is if I had not recently tied the knot, I would have never tried these in my system. My wife hated my room acoustics (though she never said so while we were dating) so after the honeymoon ended, out went over 10k worth of room tuning. This transformed my system from what I had thought was great sounding to, well let's just it sounds like, you get the idea. While at RMAF I first heard the Acoustic ART system and was blown away- I bought a complete set there on the spot. The improvements I heard at RMAF when the acoustic resonators were in the system was a significant increase in overall sound staging and a dramatic improvement in bass extension and control- no kidding. When I got them home they improved my system but not to the same degree as what I heard at the show. It was not until a few weeks later when the Synergistic web site went live with install instructions did I get evertying I heard at RMAF and then some. I have been an audiophile for over 30 years and this has created as significant an improvement as anything I have added to my system. In fact, my system sounds much more holographic with better low frequencies now then it did with my old room treatments.
If there was anything in these things then an obvious paradigm shift is to be had within the acoustic treatment sector. People want effective unobtrusive treatment and should the science actually hold up then people would be falling over themselves to build, sell and buy this stuff given the alternatives. You don't have to take more than a split second to realise why this hasn't happened.
Ted, As stated before, people maybe willing to give these products a try (me included) if they were priced within reason. Can you give us a clue as to why they cost so much
Wow Doug, you're more unreasonably entrenched on this issue than anything I think I've ever seen from you. Why?
Quote from: miklorsmith on 12 Nov 2008, 06:19 pmWow Doug, you're more unreasonably entrenched on this issue than anything I think I've ever seen from you. Why?mike, re-read aslan's post. he says that this dewice is better than his prior full-blown acoustical treatment, which oncluded tube traps, sound absorption panels, etc. while it is possible that improper placement of such dewices may have actually made his system worse in his particular setting, in general, these dewices will have real effects on room loading and soundstaging.there are some laws of physics that cannot be broken. no way a tiny set-up like that being marketed by synergistic research can have any noticeable effects on low frequencies, unwanted early reflections, etc.doug s.
Quote from: doug s. on 12 Nov 2008, 06:32 pmQuote from: miklorsmith on 12 Nov 2008, 06:19 pmWow Doug, you're more unreasonably entrenched on this issue than anything I think I've ever seen from you. Why?mike, re-read aslan's post. he says that this dewice is better than his prior full-blown acoustical treatment, which oncluded tube traps, sound absorption panels, etc. while it is possible that improper placement of such dewices may have actually made his system worse in his particular setting, in general, these dewices will have real effects on room loading and soundstaging.there are some laws of physics that cannot be broken. no way a tiny set-up like that being marketed by synergistic research can have any noticeable effects on low frequencies, unwanted early reflections, etc.doug s.Well regardless of whether you agree with Asian or not Doug, he has done comparisons within his system so good or bad, Asian has something to say. You and sts9fan and all the others on other hand aren't adding squat other than continuing the naysaying rheteric which the bulk of this thread is based upon. I for 1 would much rather read posts from someone who has actually tried these things and has something to say about them(good OR bad) over a bunch of placebo, laws of physics type posts from the uninformed. Cheers,Robin
Quote from: satfrat on 12 Nov 2008, 06:55 pmQuote from: doug s. on 12 Nov 2008, 06:32 pmQuote from: miklorsmith on 12 Nov 2008, 06:19 pmWow Doug, you're more unreasonably entrenched on this issue than anything I think I've ever seen from you. Why?mike, re-read aslan's post. he says that this dewice is better than his prior full-blown acoustical treatment, which oncluded tube traps, sound absorption panels, etc. while it is possible that improper placement of such dewices may have actually made his system worse in his particular setting, in general, these dewices will have real effects on room loading and soundstaging.there are some laws of physics that cannot be broken. no way a tiny set-up like that being marketed by synergistic research can have any noticeable effects on low frequencies, unwanted early reflections, etc.doug s.Well regardless of whether you agree with Asian or not Doug, he has done comparisons within his system so good or bad, Asian has something to say. You and sts9fan and all the others on other hand aren't adding squat other than continuing the naysaying rheteric which the bulk of this thread is based upon. I for 1 would much rather read posts from someone who has actually tried these things and has something to say about them(good OR bad) over a bunch of placebo, laws of physics type posts from the uninformed. Cheers,Robinrobin, i stand guilty as charged! doug s.
Quote from: doug s. on 12 Nov 2008, 07:09 pmQuote from: satfrat on 12 Nov 2008, 06:55 pmQuote from: doug s. on 12 Nov 2008, 06:32 pmQuote from: miklorsmith on 12 Nov 2008, 06:19 pmWow Doug, you're more unreasonably entrenched on this issue than anything I think I've ever seen from you. Why?mike, re-read aslan's post. he says that this dewice is better than his prior full-blown acoustical treatment, which oncluded tube traps, sound absorption panels, etc. while it is possible that improper placement of such dewices may have actually made his system worse in his particular setting, in general, these dewices will have real effects on room loading and soundstaging.there are some laws of physics that cannot be broken. no way a tiny set-up like that being marketed by synergistic research can have any noticeable effects on low frequencies, unwanted early reflections, etc.doug s.Well regardless of whether you agree with Asian or not Doug, he has done comparisons within his system so good or bad, Asian has something to say. You and sts9fan and all the others on other hand aren't adding squat other than continuing the naysaying rheteric which the bulk of this thread is based upon. I for 1 would much rather read posts from someone who has actually tried these things and has something to say about them(good OR bad) over a bunch of placebo, laws of physics type posts from the uninformed. Cheers,Robinrobin, i stand guilty as charged! doug s. Yea, i know you'd feel the same way about someone talking about FM tuners while not even owning one.