I mean no disrespect to anyone or to any manufactures.
I’ve been following this thread (and many others...good job guys). I’ve asked the question “how does the Stereovox HDXV Digital cable compare to the i2Digital X-60 designed by Chris Sommovigo”. I guess none of you own the i2, or don’t care to post about it.
To make a long story short, since I also have a tube system I decided to listen to a .5/M Omix Grand Master Digital Cable which arrived today, (yep that’ ...

My second day of listening to the Onix Grand Master:
SEE MY FULL POST FROM NOVEMBER 19th.
Since I have more time (and I realize the digital cable is not fully broken in) I decided to get out several of my more demanding CD’s that really push the levels of dynamics.
Cut to the chase on day two:
I noticed the Grand Master is a warmer cable that tends to broaden the width of the sound stage and is not as exact in the high register of treble and timbre (to my liking).
The i2 with the more demanding music seems to be right on. The sound stage gets larger from the front to the back while the high register of treble and timbre (of this more demanding music) sounds more pleasing to me. Incidentally the i2 was designed to have an “amazing bandwidth.”
Perhaps this is a system thing, or just my preferences. When I play less demanding music both cables sound very good, the more demanding the music, the more I like the i2.
This really makes me wonder what the HDXV sounds like?
In case you’re interested, here is the website for the i2:
http://i2digital.com/