0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 16881 times.
For consideration...............http://www.ejjordan.co.uk/basics.htmlI am liking the questions so far. Dave, don't doubt it a bit. So does a Bandor (which will play to a 100hz easily)...and a lot of others, now, name the 6 incher that "rivals a big buck tweeter"? Not a trick question, but rather "for real". I want opinions! It's "nice" we are in "agreeance" (I love that fake word).Ed
well, if price can be ignored, then perhaps a Feastrex ?
I wonder if somehow you could get similar efficiency without increasing excursion of the driver and similar bass response from the 5 that it would not better the 9 in all respects? How could that be done? Is it possible?Questions, questions, questions, the kind that might make a guy spend years fooling with single driver speakers.............thanks for playing guys....but we got a long way to go.....
This is a 2 way with a 12k HP of unknown slope with a powered built in sub system. I can't see how it could be called anything else.
A large multi way BTW will/can be a very efficient device....provided low mass (oops) high efficiency drivers are used. Cone area vs. excursion. My vote is for ALWAYS lowering excursion. There are only two ways to do it.....increase area or, hmmmmm, I am NOT going to say it!Early systems had little excursion and lots of area....contrast that to today. The exact opposite is the norm. What else was "the norm" with early drivers? Hint....small VC's, paper cone, rigid paper or cloth surround? Ed*edit*...it's raining today......