Hi fellow,
A direct comparison between the Signature & a S&B mkIII is done.
Having use the S&B for 3 years, it was replaced by the Signature since the latter was arrived somewhat 3 months ago. So the comparison is rather a re-visit of the S&B.
It doesn't take long I come to the conclusion that I prefer the Signature. The Signature sound is simply closer to "real" than the S&B. This sense of realness is mainly contributed by the better ability, at a significant margin, of reproducing sound in an "organic" way, Esther/Kinderpiele (FIM K2 HD 078) for instance. Tonal color, more 'air'......sorry for my limited description.
Having said that The S&B deliver a tighter focus picture. It might due to its pseudo-balanced design........My power amp is set at 9db gain & accept rca input only! And thus my system is quite count on output voltage from the dac. My dac xlr output is 7.5v which is perfect match with the S&B. S&B accept xlr & retains the 7.5v voltage at its rca output to power amp! The Signature is at true balanced configuration. It doesn't retain the voltage (cut it down 50% I believe) as the S&B does.
Anyway, now I found I'm not regret letting the S&B go.
cheers,
Chang