Hi,
As part of my seemingly neverending quest for a decent integrated amp I came across RWA and have been looking (lurking?) around here for a while now; just wanted to clarify something:
The 3S has been discontinued. Okay, there are/were presumably good business reasons for this. What I don't get is how this fits in with the original claim of the Sig 30 being ideally suited direct with source -- likely sounding preferable with no preamp unless the preamp is very special indeed [and later we have, e.g., Isabella] -- however, many (most?) listeners do listen to more than one source, which presumably is why the 3S was designed and brought to market, effectively allowing the use of the 30 as a 'full' integrated for those without a pre.
I became aware of RWA only recently and well after the 3S was discontinued but is goes without saying for me I'd go for a 30.2 + 3S today if the combo was available. As it stands now, not sure what I would do or if it's worth the bother: e.g., eventually order 30.2 integrated plus Isabella, listen with and without the Isabella and if the Isabella as a pre was worth it to my ears then return the 30.2 integrated and replace with the power version. Or, if the Isabella didn't suit, return it and either live with the 30.2 with one source only, or return it along with the Isabella if the 30.2's sound plus the compromise of one source on balance didn't cut it for me.
If Vinnie is now suggesting that pre/power is the way RWA is headed (with the integrated gain option there for those who only require one source or already have a pre but want more gain adjustment) then fine -- and it seems to be the way things are headed with the 70.2 monos being power-only now as well -- but no matter how good the Isabella turns out to be, the Sig amps that people have loved to date won't suddenly sound worse for lack of a pre.
I know I could get a source selector from somewhere else, e.g., Decware, but then I'm paying manufacturer B to get manufacturer A's product to work (for my needs) and the B product is not designed with A in mind; more than a visual mismatch, the money spent could result in worse sound.
I do really admire what Vinnie and his team are doing bringing innovative and high quality audio products to market in what's an increasingly tough industry. And concentrating on fewer, more popular and more profitable product lines makes perfect sense for any manufacturer. But to me, discontinuing a 0.4k product, leaving a hole that can only be plugged with a 4.0k/5.5k alternative from the same company, looks a bit.... $$$.

This isn't supposed to come across as negative and if the Isabella is as good as is being claimed, I probably wouldn't be able to resist buying it

although its preformance (over and above the 30.2/70.2) would have to be such as step up that I couldn't live without it after listening, given the downsides: the cost, another box, two more batteries and two tubes to mantain.
All the best,
kitten.