0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 82872 times.
QuoteI saw DCX screen before where you can introduce delays. In theory one just measure the distance between woofer and tweeter coils, and calculate in ms. the time difference. My understanding DCX has two types: Long and short delays. I don't know more details.The DCX has the capability to do set this automatically if a measurement microphone is connected to it's "C" input. I haven't tried it but the DSP can do it. If you are setting delay times manually you can set them by distance or time.
I saw DCX screen before where you can introduce delays. In theory one just measure the distance between woofer and tweeter coils, and calculate in ms. the time difference. My understanding DCX has two types: Long and short delays. I don't know more details.
You've heard both speakers? Could you please describe where each excels ? I can only dream of building an Orion, $2 grand drivers only and still needs 8 amplification ... so I was looking to build CS2 clone.
Quote from: gainphile2 on 29 Sep 2008, 05:29 amYou've heard both speakers? Could you please describe where each excels ? I can only dream of building an Orion, $2 grand drivers only and still needs 8 amplification ... so I was looking to build CS2 clone. I have heard both the Orions and the CS2s but NOT in the same room or with the same equipment. I would never say anything bad about the Orions, they are truly amazing but they do lack the efficiency and dynamics of the CS2. On the other hand, I find the CS2 to be bright and hard. Whether this is due to the titanium compression driver, the PE conical horn, or too low a crossover point, I don't know. Since a CS2 clone with better drivers, horns, and higher crossover is much easier and cheaper to build than an Orion clone, this is the direction that I am going.
A modified DCX goes along way towards eliminating the brightness and hardness which you speak of. George
I have heard both the Orions and the CS2s but NOT in the same room or with the same equipment. I would never say anything bad about the Orions, they are truly amazing but they do lack the efficiency and dynamics of the CS2. On the other hand, I find the CS2 to be bright and hard. Whether this is due to the titanium compression driver, the PE conical horn, or too low a crossover point, I don't know. Since a CS2 clone with better drivers, horns, and higher crossover is much easier and cheaper to build than an Orion clone, this is the direction that I am going.
Thanks for that insight. I am in the same position as you as an Orion is way out of reach financially. I'm happier than ever now to proceed with my cloning project. Will soon try to locate the selenium and horn.The DCX cost $500 here in australia, so I may try getting by with analogue filters. At the moment I have played around with a pair of my eminence 15 and have some good idea how to tame it.
Will soon try to locate the selenium and horn.
Quote from: gainphile2 on 16 Oct 2008, 12:50 amWill soon try to locate the selenium and horn.FWIW, I would NOT use the same selenium driver and PE conical horn unless you are perfectly happy with the sound of the stock CS2. Clayton recently revealed here that he is using the DDS waveguide and BMS driver on his flagship CS1. I am now experimenting with the DDS waveguide and the B&C DE250 but I have heard the Beyma drivers are the ones to beat (just ask Duke of AudioKenesis).
Magnetar, do you have impedance curve from that 21in pyle woofer?
DDS Website: http://www.ddshorns.com/catalog.php?page=ENG190ProUS Speaker carries them: http://www.usspeaker.com/dds%20cfd-eng-1-90pro-1.htm
Can you provide some detail on making/buying the foam plugs?Would you have a pic?
I have two of the Seleniums available if it makes any sense to ship from NJ.Jeff