Well, after a nerve-wracking day waiting for the RM40s to arrive, they're finally here, setup and singing. My initial reactions to the speakers are that they are fabulous, even right out of their boxes. So, have i learned anything different about my Carver Pro ZR 1600?
Well, maybe. The sound is still very detailed, dynamic and the stereo image is even more focused on the RM40s than my old Synthesis LM-300 speakers. The top end is also now showing up as more detailed, and on most recordings, it sounds as good or better than on my old speakers. However, on some older or some relly "hot" pop recordings, the top end can be less than euphonic. I wouldn't say it's fatiguing, even with old Who CDs, but it does seem to really show up warts. I'll have to listen for some time to the new speakers before i can comment on whether they are revealing any "grain" in the ZR 1600's high-frequencies.
I am sure that the amplifier BEFORE the 8th nerve modifications would've been too bright for the RM40s in my system and too my ears.