Has anyone heard these two speakers? Curious about comparative thoughts.
I doubt anyone has since at present only Bob Smith and his staff have heard the Timepiece mini.
http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=47632.msg427642#msg427642'HA! Just had a chance to tune our cables and electronics to sit down for a serious and extended listening session. Sub is definitely "optional." We thought we were listening to a standard Timepiece that had been tweaked...except that this pair of TPs completely disappeared - poof...gone. You close your eyes and float away to this enormous soundstage and 3-D image. Then you open your eyes and the brain just dis-connects. There is no way on earth such a soundstage and dynamics can come from a speaker that small. We've done it. We've actually created a truly "invisible" speaker. I knew they were gonna be darn good, but... I'm freak'n! The Mini customers have no idea what is in store for them. I always wondered before why we weren't rich already. Now I know it's just a matter of time.'
But they are two different types of speaker. The Mark & Daniel Maximus uses a ribbon, the timepiece a waveguide. Bob and others have taken measurements of ribbons and their distortion generally is nowhere near as good as what Bob uses.
http://www.zaphaudio.com/nondomes/You may prefer the sound of ribbons so a listen is of course recommended. But if accuracy is what you are after go for the Timepiece. Their lack of colouration is so good they have been compared, quite favourably, with the most accurate speaker in the midrange I have ever heard - quad electrostatics:
http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=25631.0'Can somebody say WOW here? You're comparing the Timepieces to the Quad ESL 57's?!!! Not only is that a true electrostatic, but it's a classic and it's based on principles of operation that no other speaker in the world has duplicated. There's guys that would give up a testicle before letting go of their Quads. OK, I'll say it...WOW! That's it, the price just went up to $10K/pair. (Just kidding.)'
While not a review of the Mini here is what Jim Merod, who has heard a awful lot of speakers in his time, says about the Timepiece:
http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue30/sptech_2.htm The choice seems fairly clear - if accuracy is what you are after go for the timepiece. If what sounds best to your ears is what you are after - wait until you can listen to both - because you are the only one who can judge that - other opinions are irrelevant. For me accuracy is what counts - I would go for the timepiece even without hearing them. In fact that is probably what I will be doing.
Thanks
Bill