From: Andrew Sent: October 2, 2009 12:52 PM
To: jamestanner@bryston.ca
Subject: To AVR or not?
Mr. Tanner
I've been a Bryston customer for years; I currently own:
14b sst, 6b sst, SP1.7. I also have some pieces from BAT (51se pre-amp & VK-P10se phono stage)
I've been evaluating the RM20 in my system for a few weeks and have noticed a dramatic improvement over my previous power conditioner (Richard Grey Power Company). I'm considering getting the AVR version of the RM20 ? but would do so for only audible improvements (as opposed to interface enhancements)
Can you provide any details regarding the 'audible' differences between the RM20 and the AVR RM20?
Thanks in advance,
Andrew
From: James Tanner
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 9:58 AM
To: Andrew.Netschay@confront.com
Subject: RE: To AVR or not?
Hi Andrew,
There is no sonic advantage with the AVR and that is why we offer it as an option. Unless you have serious fluctuating voltages I do not feel it is needed.
James
Hi James
First off, thanks for the extremely quick response
I?ve sent you emails over the past 6 years (since I bought my first Bryston gear SP1.7 and 9b sst) and your turnaround time is truly unique in this industry and others - greatly appreciated.
Secondly, thanks for your honest response as I could have been easily upsold.
My RGPC enhanced the sound of my system significantly; my system sounded very good with it installed. But replacing it with the TORUS took the sound to another level, my system now sounds great:
1. Wider dynamic range
2. Much greater detail in the mid-range frequence
3. Extended, detailed bass
4. More defined soundstage
Best regards
Andrew