0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 6720 times.
If he doesn't interact well, he should just let someone else do it for him.
I see its been a year since Peter has been here...http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1628
Quote from: lonewolfny42 on 15 Sep 2007, 07:55 amI see its been a year since Peter has been here...http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1628Wow...his last post was indeed one year ago today. That IS ironic, eh? As for this thread, I'd like to thank everyone for remaining on topic, and especially for avoiding the temptation to steer it in an unacceptable direction. Some have privately questioned its propriety (including me, initially) due to Audio Circle's very clearly stated "no dirty laundry" policy (look here, beneath "What can't I post?"), but if Audio Circle is about anything, it's about sharing audio-related experiences, be it with the equipment, the people or the music. As long as the discussion avoids current, ongoing disagreements, there'll be no interference from me or anyone else.Peter has generated a *LOT* of controversy through the years, and whether we're expressing our disbelief at recent exchanges or rehashing old war stories, it's all still part of the audio experience.With that said, carry on!
hi du,thanks for bringing up the appropriateness of this thread. i was considering posting about this, myself. the original post of this thread is about a specific, current experience someone had w/acoustic reality. (i, personally, think it's very appropriate.) but, i am still miffed that another thread, which discussed issues consumers had w/electraglide's william hall, was sent into the intergalactic wastebin. that thread, like this one, was the poster's first post to the audio circle. and, the original poster was actually banned for posting the thread:http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=44403.0what gives? doug s.
Quote from: doug s. on 15 Sep 2007, 07:59 pmhi du,thanks for bringing up the appropriateness of this thread. i was considering posting about this, myself. the original post of this thread is about a specific, current experience someone had w/acoustic reality. (i, personally, think it's very appropriate.) but, i am still miffed that another thread, which discussed issues consumers had w/electraglide's william hall, was sent into the intergalactic wastebin. that thread, like this one, was the poster's first post to the audio circle. and, the original poster was actually banned for posting the thread:http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=44403.0what gives? doug s.Hi doug,The topic of this thread may be about a "specific, current experience" ('recent' experience, actually ), but semantics aside, it isn't so much a gripe as as it is an expression of surprise and dismay IMHO. So while the OP's feelings about AR and Peter may remain, the situation itself isn't really "current", nor is it "ongoing" or a "disagreement", thus it is appropriate. Conversely, the referenced Electra Glide thread was and is a current, ongoing disagreement, and as such it was and is inappropriate. I don't make the rules, doug, I just try to enforce them. FWIW, I've been Audio Central's facilitator all of 8 days, and wasn’t around when all this took place.