The delay is on me, a couple of unexpected life events put me behind schedule a few days and I just finished writing everything up this past week, also keep in mind there were 8 rounds of shootout over two Saturdays and around 100 reviewer sheets to compile and condense. so it was a bit of a job in the last couple weeks even if nothing interfered. James has all the info now so we shouldn't be too long before we're in print. Thanks in advance for a bit of patience and understanding.
This is for both StereoMojo and you. I wrote my post/response early today or was it late last night?
. Anyhow, I didn't mean to come off in any sort of negative way whatsoever. I hope you know that my only point is to take into consideration, for future reference, the "professional" nature of such publications. I can understand personal issues that may interfere, but it is to say that it seems like there was just so much information involved that even if you knew a week ahead of time, you could have revised the anticipated date and even stated something like, "this is taking much longer than we had anticipated and the wait will be well worth it. We "cannot" say when the results will be posted, but we are looking now at a point sometime around mid-April, etc.".
Anyhow...I'm sorry to hear that you have to deal with so much work on top of your everyday job/life/work and I hope that A) We get a revised date of finalization that may be a give/take sort of date (see above="may" be done by mid April, or even at the end of April, etc. etc. and B) That you understand that this is only my opinion on how I would have personally handled this situation and that I, nor anyone else should or has any hard feelings about this review not being in by the time stated.
Will keep my eyes open and hope that you and your family and personal life is at the most important healthy state, and that I thank you for what you offer to the community of us audio lovers. Thanks again for everything and all you do.
Regards,
Audioexcels
