Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 9406 times.

Ears

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 712
Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #40 on: 4 Sep 2003, 10:10 pm »
Ws, go to www.avsforum.com and do a search on Phillips 963sa and you will find out how to do the upgrade yourself.

I started hearing about the 1080i upconversion upgrade around a month ago or so...so yes I guess it is new.

wshuff

Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #41 on: 5 Sep 2003, 12:30 am »
Cool.  I'll have to check that out.  Thanks.

JoshK

Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #42 on: 5 Sep 2003, 02:18 pm »
Thanks Werticus, that was what I was wondering.  I am not sure if it would bother me or not.  I think that is in between the Sony and the Panny.

WerTicus

Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #43 on: 5 Sep 2003, 05:57 pm »
hrmmm if you find it bothersome your pretty anal.  :)

A8

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #44 on: 24 Sep 2003, 06:01 am »
The reason the 2900 takes some time to fire up is that it buffers the data before you see and hear anything.......the other side of that is that there are no layerchanges which imo is more important.

Rob Babcock

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 9322
Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #45 on: 24 Sep 2003, 06:13 am »
Wshuff, I have the Pioneer, too, and am planning on upgrading.  I'll either get the 2900, or... I've heard the DVD 2200 has basically the same audio section, I'm just doing a little more research to see for sure.

I love my DV-45A, just always been a Denon fan & heard it was a better machine for MC audio...

WerTicus

Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #46 on: 24 Sep 2003, 09:54 am »
i have heard that if your getting the player for audio you would be well advised to look into the marantz 8400... similar to the 2900 but with no ic's in the analog output stages

ummm so anyways apparantly it kicks the 2900's arse for dvda/sacd stuff.
but its $1000 more aust.  which is LOTS isnt it?!

the 2200 has a wimpy powersupply i hear... this will have a major effect on the sound.   but if your using a bose sound system im sure anything sounds bad!

I just did the cat5 cable mod and ... let me just say ... wow :)

wshuff

Anyone tried the Denon DVD-2900?
« Reply #47 on: 25 Sep 2003, 12:50 am »
Rob,

I had always owned Pioneer DVD players, mostly because I started in this hobby about 12 years ago with a Pioneer LD player.  I got the DV-45A because it was about the cheapest universal player around and I wanted to try DVD-A and SACD.  I enjoyed what I heard, and could live with the picture, even though I knew that it wasn't giving me top-notch deinterlacing.  Then I got an Pannie RP82 and the differences were apparent.  I'm not saying that the Pioneer looked like an old VHS tape in comparison, but I noticed several little anomalies that I had always just accepted with the Pioneer simply weren't there with the Pannie.  I think what I really noticed more than anything was the absence of combing.  Anyway, that sold me on the Pannie for DVD viewing.

When the Denon 2900 came out my friend at the A/V store offered to let me take it home and see how I liked it.  Well, it never went back.  The build quality is far and away the best I've ever had in a DVD player, much better than the DV-45A and better than my prior DV-37.  It reminds me more of my LD players.  Anyway, the picture quality of the 2900 is comparable to the RP82, and probably I like it even better.  Can't really articulate why, and I only have one duplicate DVD for A/B testing, but the picture just seems better to me.  Add in that I like the remote better, and there is no layer change, and the Denon is preferred.

With audio, I also found that I preferred the Denon.  My suspicion is that it is doing bass management better (or maybe, it is doing bass management), so it just sounds better to me.  More full, more real.  Perhaps I just have it set at a higher volume.  Anyway, the DV-45A got shuffled off to the bedroom, and is now with me in a second system in my girlfriend, er, now wife's, apartment.  I still like it, but given the choices, I would never buy it again when I could get pretty much the same thing for less in one of the Pioneer budget players.  But I probably wouldn't go that route either now that I've seen what good deinterlacing looks like.  Whether Faroudja or SI, any future DVD player will have to have something comparable.  I think the Denon 2200 looks like a good package based on the specs.  It might be the way to go if somebody doesn't want to spring for the Denon 2900.

Doug_B

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 77
My 2900 Impressions
« Reply #48 on: 6 Oct 2003, 04:58 pm »
I had the 2900 in my system back in August. My reason for purchase was to improve DVD-A performance, relative to my current RP-91.

In summary, although the unit was fairly detailed for all audio formats and whipped the RP-91 on DVD-A, it did not mate well with my system (which includes ribbon-based speakers, Soundline Audio). I thought the sound lacked a certain cohesiveness (maybe referred to as smoothness?), like the individual notes did not coalesce. I generally heard this missing ingredient with all of the formats. On paper, the DACs are pretty good (a customized Burr-Brown version, I believe?), but I suspect other attributes that are critical to the overall audio presentation were not as robust. As a result, back it went to the dealer.

I am currently considering a modded universal player that I will use for all digital formats. It's possible that I will opt for a modded 2900, although I think a modwright'ed Pioneer universal with tube mod is on the top of my candidate list.

FWIW, I had no problem with the video portion of the 2900. Didn't seem soft to me on my 92"D screen with Infocus 7200 (although I am not very video prolific and didn't do extensive testing in this area). I also cound not detect the alt flag problem (whatever it's called) on the Monsters Inc DVD unless I zoomed to 4x and forwarded slo-mo field by field.

Doug