pugs
What do you like better about the B&K and what is the loudness level at which it starts to go south. Are we talking ear splitting rock and roll, just above conversation level or something in between
The B&K is really smooth, and kind of lush sounding. There is no edginess at all.
The first thing I noticed when I hooked up the B&K was that the soudstage depth was really flat compared to the Odyssey's. Transparancy, soundstage, imaging, clarity, bass, impact was all better with the Odyssey's. The B&K has a lushness (maybe colored?) to the sound that is very pleasing.
I estimate that the B&K begins to sound more distorted when decibles are in the mid to high 80's. When my wife plays her rap, it is especially noticeable. She's the one really pushing for me to get new amps because she loved cranking up the music LOUD with the Odyssey's. The Odyssey's never ran out of juice.
My system is also used for HT, and with the Odyssey's in my system, my HT sounded MUCH better. It's not a fair comparison though because I had 3 Odyssey's for the front three channels and the B&K for the surrounds. Now I am using the B&K for the L & R channels, and my Denon AVR-4800 runs the center and surrounds.
I could almost settle using the B&K long term, but my HT suffers too much. I want to explore higher quality amps with a similar sound hoping to have all of the technical qualities of the Odyssey's, with the lushness of the B&K. Hopefully the D-200's will give me what I need.
I don't have a lot of experience listening to different equipment so I 'm still discovering what I like.