Single Power EQ Tubey

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 8570 times.

GHM

Finally found what I was lookig for!
« Reply #20 on: 29 Nov 2005, 09:09 pm »
I finally found the unit I've been searching for.
JLM.. I think you've been looking for the same thing. The plus is you get tone controls with the unit. It uses octal tubes ..I know you'll like that. It comes with a separate power supply that's attached by a umbilical cord. He can build the unit any way you like.
Mikhail is the man when it comes to customization! :D
Here's a couple of pics of the unit . One pic with a switcher that I'm not getting. If you need it in black..he can do that to.
This unit is a tubed buffer with tone controls. The base model is $650 the upgraded model that accepts 6SN7 tubes was $100 more. I've already ordered mine. Hopefully I'll get it before Christmas.

I decided to go this route because I have a passive volume control already inside my integrated. No need to add a second or go through the trouble of having it bypassed. This seemed the best solution. It is a new product not yet on the website.





-Richard-

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 853
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #21 on: 29 Nov 2005, 09:41 pm »
Nice find GHM,

Your powers of investigation are wonderful...

I am a very serious adherent of tone controls...it is impossible to imagine that
all CD's...or in terms of the newest hard drive generated media like the ipods...
all digitally stored media...were recorded the same...

Tone controls give us the option to dial in or out a bit of tone if needed to
compensate for any recording aberrations...

There used to be a 3-way control on earlier tube amps...so that the mid range
was kept intact and unaffected...the Quad for example uses a unique approach...
the tonal extremes move toward the midrange in a see-saw configuration...

I wonder how much tonal variation this product can effect?

Thanks GHM for your thoroughness and for sharing your findings with us...

Warm regards -Richard-

GHM

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #22 on: 29 Nov 2005, 10:11 pm »
Quote from: -Richard-



 I am a very serious adherent of tone controls...it is impossible to imagine that
all CD's...or in terms of the newest hard drive generated media like the ipods...
all digitally stored media...were recorded the same...

Tone controls give us the option to dial in or out a bit of tone if needed to
compensate for any recording aberrations...

There used to be a 3-way control on earlier tube amps...so that the mid range
was kept intact  ...


Thanks,
Richard
I've been searching feverishly for the right component.Talking to and emailing different equipment designers all over the country and beyond. :o Jack Elliano is a wizard and great guy to learn from.So is Steve Deckert. I also communicated with the designer of Eddie current headamps and Peter Daniels about what I was looking for.

The true test will be listening.But this looks to be a step in the right direction..I'm hoping.
I also agree on the tone controls...even though I haven't used them in any system I've owned. Something tells me their going to come in handy. There's always a recording that just doesn't cut the mustard on it's own. I've noticed in the past there are times when I wish I had them with badly recorded music. Mikhail told me the tone controls don't have a negative effect on the music. He says the controls attenuate ever so slightly. This will be my first dip in tone control waters ..the way you talk Richard ..the controls may become addictive for me. :lol:

-Richard-

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 853
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #23 on: 30 Nov 2005, 01:07 am »
Hi GHM,

My 9 year old integrated tube Single Ended Pentode amplifier has tone controls...

I would feel a bit lost without them...I dial in and out bass and treble according
to each recordings personality...if the bass gets honky I dial bass out until it
sounds firm...if the recording is highly refined I can dial in the treble knowing
that the top frequencies will sound silkier and resolve themselves well...

The purest approach would give a snooty raise of the eyebrows, the edges
of the mouth would curl up in a deepening fold, the eyes would widen and there would
be an abnormal amount of blinks at reading what I just wrote...

I could even go further and suggest that if the designers of most of today's amps
would care to spend some time in R and D they could probably find ingenious
ways of adding tone controls to their amps without a noticeable degradation in
sound...am I suggesting they are lazy?....hummmmmmmmm...of course that
would add some expense to the amps cost...but I for one would gladly build that
extra expense into my budget for the ability to gain some much needed control
over the recorded material...

Nice find GHM...I am very excited to read your feedback once you have
burned in the EQ Tubey and have played around with those wonderful
tone controls...

Again...Great research on your part...

Warm Regards -Richard-

Dmason

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1283
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #24 on: 30 Nov 2005, 01:28 am »
That thing is the best chunk o' kit I have seen in a long time. It will be interesting to compare the miniature triodes with the dual triode octals. My money's on the octals...Tone controls are a good thing. Every musical instrument ever built can have its tone controlled. It has open baffle written all over it.

JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10760
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #25 on: 30 Nov 2005, 01:38 am »
DMason,

Good to see you again.


GHM,

I know I've seen that thing somewhere, but great catch!  What are the stock tubes?  I'd probably go without the tone controls (haven't used them except to mess around in 25+ years).  Wonder if he'd go 12SN7?

Waiting to get my vino SB3 and compare the stock Clari-T and Teac before sending the Teac in for more vino.  Next I need room treatments, and then I can think about this guy.  Plenty of time to get your impressions in.

GHM

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #26 on: 30 Nov 2005, 01:52 am »
Man I'm sure glad to see you here D. If not by anyone else but me ..you have been missed! I miss reading your post.Just as I would miss reading Richard's post. He is the wizard of words..that for sure!

You guys had me months ago with these octal tubes. My mouth has been  watering ever since for the colour they and other tubes give music.

Richard that would be great ..the tone control amplifiers that is. Some need tone controls really bad. :lol:  If you know what I mean. :wink:

After having a long conversation with Mikhail today. I envy the people that are able to do something that gives them total pleasure and still make a living at it. This must be one of the greatest feelings in the world. Maybe one day I can get to that point...I can only dream for now .

JLM,
He told me you could use pretty much any tube you wanted. All the units are custom built so no two maybe the same. He will build it to suit whatever the person wants. I told him I didn't need the tone controls either. He said don't use them if you don't need them. After I thought about it..it will be good just to have them when I do need them.

My unit won't have the tube covers.Since I'll be using the 6SN7 tubes which are larger than the tubes in the pic. He planned to use the 12Au7 tubes first but I explained that I wanted to give the Octals a go.So he changed my order. The 6CG7 tubes are the standard tubes.

-Richard-

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 853
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #27 on: 30 Nov 2005, 08:20 am »
Hi Dan,

Nice to see your presence here...I would like to add my name to the list of
friends here at AC who have missed your exciting and experienced presence...

Your archeological audio digs, innovative thinking and creative designs
are deeply appreciated...

We are a community of friends for certain...incorporeal of course!!!

In a way quite inconceivable before the web became an extension of a kind
of Outer Body experience...minds floating in the intangible ether of wires and
digital energy fields...

DeathStars? Well...we are still out there among the stars...along with the angels...

We can only wonder...and wait to hear of your latest journey into the Audio
Unknown...the Outer Limits...the Twilight Zone of audio...

Korneff 45? The world of SET's is truly a Garden of Delights...the first panel, Eden...
not the third panel of the famous Bosch painting...which is more like Solid State Hell...

Perhaps if you can find the time it would be wonderful to hear some of your
thoughts and insights into the DeathStars and the Korneff 45...

Warm Regards -Richard-

JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10760
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #28 on: 30 Nov 2005, 12:40 pm »
Can anyone compare the sound/imaging, cost, and availability of 12AU7, 6CG7, 6SN7, and 12SN7 for a tube buffer?

I recall Dr. Dan contrasting small 9 pin vs. bigger octals as having less bloom/magic, but have heard others complain that the octals can be too much of a good thing with changable charteristics as they age.  He has also really been excited about the whole tube/digital synergy.

GHM, why did Mikhail first suggest the 12AU7?  Decware offers a tube buffer (sold primarily as a bandaid for cheap CD players) that users seem to prefer the 12AU7.

Any other tube suggestions?  

My FTA-2000/Clari-T is sounding wonderful, but like any other audiophile am easily teased into wanting more and more.

Thanks

JoshK

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #29 on: 30 Nov 2005, 02:47 pm »
Just a couple thoughts guys.  I don't know anything about what topology that Mikhail used, but the use of the term "buffer" suggests to me two things.  First, I assume this has unity gain, since buffers are usually meant to have no gain.  Thus I would fanthom a guess that it is a cathode follower topology.  Second, buffers usually help, or should help with driving long cables and such so they have to have a little bit of current output.  Again either CF or SRPP topologies come to mind.  

I say this because sometimes the topology sometimes suggest a different type of tube will work better than others.  If it is a CF, I know some otherwise loved tubes don't behave well in this setup.  If you asked Mikhail and he is willing to tell you then it may help you read up on what kind of tubes do well in this application.

GHM

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #30 on: 30 Nov 2005, 11:11 pm »
Quote from: JLM
Can anyone compare the sound/imaging, cost, and availability of 12AU7, 6CG7, 6SN7, and 12SN7 for a tube buffer?

I recall Dr. Dan contrasting small 9 pin vs. bigger octals as having less bloom/magic, but have heard others complain that the octals can be too much of a good thing with changable charteristics as they age.  He has also really been excited about the whole tube/digital synergy.

GHM, why did Mikhail first suggest the 12AU7?  Decware offers a tube buffer (sold primarily as a bandaid for cheap ...


Hi JLM,

He told me the 12au7 type tubes are very clear and precise when used in this setup. The 6SN7 has a larger sound stage with better bloom and tone.The 6SN7 tubes are also in abundance. He says it's not overly tubey though. He and I both agree on this ..He nor I  like listening to music when it sounds like cotton is stuffed in our ears.  I want tone with attack and decay with no loss in bass perfomance either. He's assured me this won't be a problem with this unit. It's actually a tubed low gain stage. I gave him the specifics on my output voltage /impedance of my Dac and the input of the integrated. He also wanted to know where I set the volume control normally.

I know about the Decware Zbox. I nearly purchased one.But I want a unit that isn't a bandaid. I've read some not so good things about the Zbox. One of them is noise. Since my unit is so sensitive to hum and noise I needed something dead quiet. What better to use than a component designed for headphones? If a company makes noisy head amps they won't be in business long. :lol:

This unit is quite a step up from the Zbox. If I'm not mistaken the unit comes with a 250 or 300 volt transformer in a separarte enclosure. Hell this unit has more power than some decent power amplifiers.He said I could upgrade it to a 300v Plitron transformer.But this transformer cost $250 alone. My Integrated uses the same transformer I figured that's enough for me.

He builds his units with tremendous headroom in power. Look around.. I doubt you can find any tube buffer from another company that uses this kind of power...not even close. The Musical Fidelity combo will run $800.
Since owning a Integrated by them and listening to some of the other offerings..I'm not impressed. The MF house sound is short of resolution and the decay of instruments IMHO.

I don't consider buffers a bandaid. You have really high end audio equipment with buffers already installed(this is what APL does to their modded players). It makes for better transients(dynamic swing), snap in the music and even more controled and defined bass.. Most cd players/Dac output impedances run fairly high 3000 ohms or more isn't uncommon. I tried a small SS buffer in a previous system. The difference was very noticeable.


Better yet here is the info Jack sent me on his PVA unit.It explains why having a form of buffer stage in the mix makes for better music as a whole.His PVA unit looks interesting but won't work well with my setup. Someone using a tube amplifier may benefit from this device. I also prefer to add tubes to the system of all SS...the mix of SS and tubes works well for me.

Passive Preamplifier - No longer an Oxymoron

An introduction into amplification with passive devices.

By  Jack Elliano - Electra-Print Audio Co.


INTRODUCTION

Line amplifiers are most commonly used to increase level of a CD player or phono preamp into the amplifiers. Line amps do not have to amplify very much to accomplish this. The average overall gain needed is about four. Normally the job is done with an active device such as a tube with its conventional means to offer a low impedance output to the power amplifiers with standard interconnects.

A not so popular means to increase gain is with the use of a step up transformer plus some sort of a variable gain control. This usually fails due as a result of the output impedance being too high for the interconnect cable capacity and attenuation of high frequencies. However, step up transformers using a low impedance source signal can offer a usable stepped up impedance with very little affect from interconnect cable capacity.

One saving grace that has become more in popular with music source devices is the very low output impedance of about 50 to 100 ohms.   New computer based, hard drive music delivery systems use a pro audio sound card that develop an extremely linear sound, using standard 50 ohm balanced and unbalanced outputs.


TRANSFORMER DESIGN

One such step up transformer arrangement that will work with op amp outputs must have certain characteristics that will assure full bandwidth, constant load and low distortion.   It's primary winding must have a low DCR (Direct Current Resistance) and enough inductance to react with the low end. This parameter is necessary because the DCR is added to the total impedance and is a loss.

Due to the very low voltage and power at this impedance, a core material must be used that will increase inductance and move fast over zero crossing at low levels. Nickel laminations work very well at these levels and offer very high permeability. This transformer will also need a high coupling, low capacity wind. We tried a few arrangements of step up and settled with a 1 to 8 voltage gain which offered an impedance of 10,000 ohms from 150 ohm source. This worked well with a 10,000 ohm high quality audio taper control as a constant load and a means to vary the gain for the amplifiers. We calculated that 80khz is the -3db point  using a 50pf interconnect from 10,000 ohms source.    This seemed safe enough.     Note that a 400pf interconnect from a 10,000 ohm source at 20khz will give a reactance of 19,000 ohms so a rolloff of about -2db would be measured.    When reactance is equal to source impedance, this is -3db.    

The transformer we built, and used in this circuit, had an overall bandwidth -1db from 6hz to 55khz.  Bandwidth was achieved with 49% nickel core and proper longitudinal balanced windings. The 10K secondary load forced a constant impedance back to the source to operate with. This offered good operational characteristics.    

WHAT WORKS AND WON'T WORK

The input impedance of a common tube amplifier is mostly the value of its input tube grid resistor.   This impedance does not have to be matched, it is not transferring power.   If it is too low, less than 20K, it may lower the total gain of the PVA (Passive Voltage Amplifier, our name for this) output.    The input sensitivity of the amplifier is the most important parameter needed.   Sensitivities of .25 to 1 volt will work good and the higher input levels may not give full power output.
The output impedance of the PVA is the sum of the resulting transformer secondary and  resistance used within the volume control.  
Some music sources may not work with the this PVA design due to there higher output impedance’s.   One remedy for this is to wind a different ratio step up to offer lower gain levels.   The CD players with cathode follower outputs most likely are about 3000 ohms so the voltage level should be sufficient to drive an attenuator only, to amplifier input.   It would benefit the waveform to pass it through a 1:1 ratio transformer and its nickel core.
These type  transformers can be custom wound to accommodate any ratio needed.  Due to the small size, nickel core and levels involved, a wide bandwidth is always a result.
 
MEASURING OUTPUT IMPEDANCE

One means to measure output impedance of a CD player, with close results, is to have a test CD with a 1Khz signal, play it and measure the open unloaded, output signal on a good AC voltmeter.    Then add a variable resistance across it, adjust it until the value is half of the open measurement, remove this resistance and measure its resistance with a standard ohmmeter.   That value should be very close to the source impedance, at least at 1Khz.
 




SIMPLE CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION

As the circuit diagram shows, the volume control wiper then goes to the output, and if
needed to sub woofer outputs. The 1k resistor between these outputs are to isolate any low pass filter effects from the normal output. The circuit arrangement here assures that the bandwidth will not change, no matter what volume level you use. It will not add or subtract inductance and capacity as other tapped ratio devices will.  The output or source impedance of this device is within 10K or so. It is best to keep the output to the amplifier interconnect capacity, around 50pf.  

If component isolation is necessary due to a ground loop or if a  hum develops while interconnecting unit, the input jacks must be insulated from case.     Remove the ground from the input winding or jack.    Grounds on the output and bass output must be common and cannot be isolated from each other.

LISTENING NOTES

The audible result of this device is very interesting and different. One noticeable difference is the increase of amplitude range from low level to high levels as well as increased detail. It can be said that with a nonactive or passive means to develop amplification has an extremely accurate transfer characteristic result. A tube, as many people experience, will add its signature to the sound. Obviously, with no power supply, this design will have no power supply noise residue despite having gain. Normal listening level ranged from 11:00 o'clock to 2:00 o'clock on the control so it has plenty of gain.

The silver secondary version of the transformer sounded the same as the all copper but a slight but noticeable added softness or silky sound. Silver is more sensitive to flux
variations than copper, it may reveal very high number harmonics.

One added comment is that a nickel core low level audio transformer seems to have an interesting resulting sound.   The first thing noticed is a wide swing in dynamic range very different from the original CD player opamp output.   The second is a clean, rich delivery of harmonics of strings and brass.    It was also noted that it will bring out a poorly recorded CD.    We know little at this point as to why these are happening but our theories are piling up.

CONSTRUCTION

The PVA should be built with a steel chassis for best results. Steel will absorb stray magnetic fields from power transformers and chokes in other equipment located nearby. Switching to other inputs can be added to the design in order to accommodate other music sources provided source output impedance’s are between 50 and 150 ohms. Do not exceed 3 volts input or the nickel core will saturate and distortion will occur at low frequencies.      


PARTS LIST

2 - PVA-3 Electraprint transformer (nickel laminations with copper wire - $51 each) or      
     PVA-3S Electraprint transformer (nickel laminations with silver secondary - $250 each)
1 - 10k audio taper volume pot or equivalent
1 - 7"x5"x2" steel chassis with bottom plate or equivalent
6 - RCA jacks
2 - 1k-1/2 watt resistors

-Richard-

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 853
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #31 on: 1 Dec 2005, 03:28 am »
Hi GHM,

You mentioned that: "...Hell this unit has more power than some decent
power amplifiers..."

Is it reasonable to assume that this essentially line stage/"buffer"/passive preamp
can in fact be used as an amplifier in situations where highly efficient
speakers are being used?

If that would be true...how many watts would the EQTubey be the equivalent of?

If not...could the gain be optimized to fit the role of amplifier?

Your handling of information is exemplary...educational, factual and simple in the
best sense of that word...it is indeed a pleasure to read your posts and I am
learning a great deal about this new...for me...direction in solving the mysteries
of amplification...

Nice work GHM!!!!!!!

Warm Regards -Richard-

GHM

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #32 on: 1 Dec 2005, 09:28 am »
Hi Richard,

From talking to Mikhail. Yes his head units can be configured by him to be  OTL amplifiers or preamplifiers. The PPX could be a 4 wpc amplifier using a Quad of EL34 tubes , 6EM8 or  509 tubes. The more powerful the unit the more wattage you could achieve . His top head unit weighs 150 lbs and fully balanced..what a monster! :lol:

He told me he would tailor his units to what ever the customer wants.
That pretty much means he'll make it do or be what ever you want it to be.  :D

mcgsxr

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #33 on: 1 Dec 2005, 01:47 pm »
Nice to see DMason back in the fold again!

Interesting thread, for folks looking for that tube magic.

Keep us up to date, on the decision, and the results!

Rob N

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 4
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #34 on: 6 Dec 2005, 07:30 pm »
This is my Singlepower amp.It's in a smaller chassis than the 150lb one mentioned above but it's still pretty massive


JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10760
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #35 on: 6 Dec 2005, 08:47 pm »
Impressive hunk of electronics!!

Rob N

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 4
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #36 on: 6 Dec 2005, 10:04 pm »
Or gold plated 8)


GHM

Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #37 on: 6 Dec 2005, 10:46 pm »
:o  Damn those are monsters!!! What's the power rating on those behemoths? Rob that's some beautiful equipment you have there.I'm sure it sounds as good as it looks. :D Mikhail told me he builds some serious high end equipment. Seeing is believing!

How do you like the gear? Are those 6SN7 tubes in your preamp?

Rob N

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 4
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #38 on: 7 Dec 2005, 07:53 am »
Yes they are 6SN7's in the SDS-XLR and it has a 5U4 rectifier in the power supply.I mainly use it for headphones and it's extremely good,very smooth,very large soundstage and good detail.

I don't know anyone who has ordered a gold Singlepower.

BTW nickel plated Singlepowers can also be made 8)

JLM

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 10760
  • The elephant normally IS the room
Single Power EQ Tubey
« Reply #39 on: 8 Dec 2005, 12:24 pm »
Not wanting to be snoopy, but was wondering what basic circuit design is used in the Single Power amps.  I've been told that different tubes behave differently depending on the circuit they're in.

The 6moons review elluded to the propriatory nature of the circuit.