0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 16090 times.
Anyway, I agree with the person above indicating the ML's can get "canny" - could be my amp, not sure, but they get very "harsh" sounding and fatique me pretty quickly. Maybe I ought to treat my room and see what happens?
in my book the Martin Logans show more detail, are faster
i've owned SL3s...and thought they are brutal w/upstream gear. if you hear something harsh or canny...it aint the speakers. trust me.also, room treatments (unless you are allready in a perfect acoustical room...which is unlikely) are definately a must w/them..and probably all bi-directional speakers.I could not get my room "right" ..which is why i got rid of mine. they were more speaker than my room could deal with w/o A LOT of treatments...and the WAF was very, very low when it came to hanging foam.
... The scale, micro dynamics, transiants the complete musical picture for me only exists in large planars. ...
Quote from: Florian... The scale, micro dynamics, transiants the complete musical picture for me only exists in large planars. ...Florian,allow me to disagree on this point. From memory, I can say that my 626R (small panels) in my "Sound Cocoon" had better microdynamics than the Apogee Diva (large panels) in your room. My explanation is simple: I had an almost anacheoic environnement. Reflections on the walls blurr the sound and hide the intimate sonic texture of musical instruments.Bruno
Florian -- which capicitors do you have in your RM-30s and 626R speakers?
I doubt anyone would be unhappy with the CD version of the RM 30 in any regard. The bass in particular is much better. The 626 also takes a big leap forward in its CD configuration.Watch this space for more details!
Right now we are producing wave guides by hand and just shipped a pair of RM1a with such attached. I await owner reaction.