Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters

jseymour and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 945 times.

Cloud.sessions

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 44
Everyone thinks they know the story: balanced is “modern,” “clean,” and automatically superior. And sure—if you’re running 100-foot cables across a studio floor, that’s true.
But in a high-end home system?
Here’s the part no one likes to say out loud:
A properly engineered single-ended tube stage can sound more natural, more continuous, and more harmonically correct than most balanced circuits.
Not despite being single-ended—because it is.
Most audiophiles treat “balanced” as gospel.
But once you step out of the marketing bubble and into real engineering, one truth becomes impossible to ignore:
In a tube line stage, single-ended is often the purer, cleaner, and more musically truthful topology.
Here’s the breakdown.


1. Harmonics: the part nobody wants to talk about
Balanced circuits cancel even-order harmonics by design.
That’s their job.
But those even-order harmonics are the very thing that make triodes sound dimensional, human, and alive. They’re not “distortion” in the pejorative sense — they’re psychoacoustic cues.
Single-ended preserves the full harmonic structure of the tube.
No summing nodes, no cancellation math, no symmetry games.
Just pure triode behavior, intact.


2. The brutal reality of tubes: they don’t match
Balanced tube stages require near-perfect symmetry:
both triodes must track each other; over temperature, over age, over drift, and over manufacturing variation.

That’s fantasy.
Tubes do not stay matched, and never have.
To force them into balance, designers must add:
matching networks

balancing resistors

servo loops

extra gain stages

trimming components

Every one of those parts interacts with signal, phase, impedance, noise, and bandwidth.
Single-ended sidesteps the entire balancing circus.
A single triode, biased optimally, doing clean Class-A work with:
fewer series components

fewer summing nodes

fewer coupling interfaces

better stability over tube life

And fewer places for the sound to get smeared.


3. Noise performance: SE is not the weak link — the power supply is
People love saying “balanced is quieter.”
Sure — in a studio with 100 ft cables and lighting dimmers.
In a high-end home system?
Noise is dominated by:
PSU architecture

grounding

physical layout

parasitics

regulator quality

rectifier recovery behavior

Not by whether the signal is balanced or single-ended.
A properly engineered SE stage — with ultra-quiet regulators, disciplined grounding, and tightly controlled parasitics — will often measure and sound quieter than a typical balanced tube stage. Balanced circuits double the number of active gain elements, which doubles their broadband noise contribution. Differential summation cancels common-mode noise, but it does not cancel the tube’s own internal noise.
Balanced only helps when the underlying circuit is noisy to begin with.


4. Modern amplifiers don’t care — their input stages are smarter than people think
Feeding a balanced amp from a single-ended preamp is not a compromise.
Today’s differential input stages are instrumentation-grade:
extremely low noise

extremely low THD

transparent SE → balanced conversion

no tonal penalty

The amp handles the conversion internally with vanishing distortion.
You are not giving anything up.


5. Why it matters.
Balanced isn’t “bad.”
It’s just not the universal cure-all people pretend it is.
In tube audio — especially line-level circuits — single-ended often delivers:
more coherent harmonic structure

purer timing

fewer interacting parts

lower broadband noise (when done right)

better preservation of the tube’s natural voice

simpler, more stable long-term operation

And most importantly:
It often just sounds more like actual music.

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 21334
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #1 on: 27 Nov 2025, 03:10 pm »
Tube amps are all SE inputs.

Rocket_Ronny

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1436
  • Your Room Is Everything - Use It Well.
    • ScriptureSongs.com
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #2 on: 27 Nov 2025, 09:20 pm »
Excellent write up Cloud.

I am still single myself. Listening to a quad pair of KT88s as I write. Just lovely.

What are your favourite tube pre and amp combos?

Rocket Ronny

Tyson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11602
  • Without music, life would be a mistake.
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #3 on: 27 Nov 2025, 10:02 pm »
I agree with everything in the first post.  For tube amps and preamps, single ended is the way to go.

Rusty Jefferson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 02:40 am »
I appreciate the sentiment but there's no absolutes here. I have 2 friends each with amazing systems in great rooms. One running single ended tube amplifiers, the other, balanced tube amplifiers. They're both just great places to experience music. There's too many variables to lay it solely on being single ended (imo). :)

I.Greyhound Fan

Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 03:02 am »
All I can say is that my Pass X250 amp and my Cambridge 851c CDP
sounded better with XLRS of the same brand of RCA cables. Cables are 1 meter.

FullRangeMan

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 21334
  • To whom more was given more will be required.
    • Never go to a psychiatrist, adopt a straycat or dog. On the street they live only two years average.
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 03:47 am »
It would be the lower noise floor?

I.Greyhound Fan

Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 03:44 pm »
It would be the lower noise floor?

Yes, the music was slightly more clear.

pstrisik

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1347
  • Holding pattern in Audio Nirvana in the PNW!
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 05:12 pm »
Cloud,  A comment and a question:

Comment:  Your advocating of SE vs Balanced seems contrary to what Don Sachs (@dls123) has said here.  Here are a couple of examples:
https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=189142.msg1994240#msg1994240
https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=189142.msg2003879#msg2003879

Are these contrary views or am I missing something?

Question:  With your view about SE advantages, what happens when the chain is mixed?  For example, I run SE from DAC to tube pre then SE into an SE to Balanced converter (https://orchardaudio.com/shop/stereo-rca-to-xlr-converter/) then Balanced into amps. 

Thanks for your comments,
      ....Pete

I.Greyhound Fan

Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 07:13 pm »
Cloud,  A comment and a question:

Comment:  Your advocating of SE vs Balanced seems contrary to what Don Sachs (@dls123) has said here.  Here are a couple of examples:
https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=189142.msg1994240#msg1994240
https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=189142.msg2003879#msg2003879

Are these contrary views or am I missing something?

Question:  With your view about SE advantages, what happens when the chain is mixed?  For example, I run SE from DAC to tube pre then SE into an SE to Balanced converter (https://orchardaudio.com/shop/stereo-rca-to-xlr-converter/) then Balanced into amps. 

Thanks for your comments,
      ....Pete

Well, it is my understanding that the whole chain must be balanced otherwise you loose any benefit.

Here is a SE to XLR converter from Van Alstine-

https://avahifi.com/collections/accessories/products/dva-r2x


Tyson

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11602
  • Without music, life would be a mistake.
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 07:23 pm »
I do find I like tube gear with really good output transformers.  To me a lot of the magic from tubes is from the transformers.  Heck even my tube DACS have transformers.  ANK 4.1 and Abbas Audio 5.0. 

Cloud.sessions

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 44
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #11 on: Yesterday at 07:33 pm »
Hehe I knew this would spur a debate  :D

I’m not saying balanced (especially with tubes) is inferior to SE but I AM saying the opposite is also not true. There are actually a number of advantages that single ended tube amps have that designers must solve when moving to balanced tube gear. The good designers do a good job at minimizing the disadvantages that balanced tube gear have.

@pstrisik

Yes me and Don have had many discussions about this and we see this differently. I’m not interested in my tube gear being studio gear. Give me even order harmonic distortion (not to much obviously it’s like salt. It’s great if there’s just enough, if there’s too much it can ruin the whole dish.) I love everything it does, the euphonic character, the holographic soundstage, the tonal density and richnes.
To me the largest obstacle a designer must overcome in tube gear is noise. And balanced is not inherently superior at that in a home audio system.
Here’s an example our new line stage preamp The Dawn is measuring below -115dbv on noise floor measurements. I urge you to find another tube preamp under $10,000 hitting those marks. And we’re not resorting to feedback or other tools to achieve that. This is a Class A single ended, no feedback/feedforward, no PSSR circuitry. This is about as pure of a circuit as you can get and it’s all SE.

I think if the conversion stage is designed well there is very little loss.

pstrisik

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1347
  • Holding pattern in Audio Nirvana in the PNW!
Re: Break Free From The Dogma: Why Single-Ended Still Matters
« Reply #12 on: Yesterday at 08:17 pm »
Thanks for the clarification, the juxtaposition of the two views makes more sense to me now.