McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 12233 times.

earlmarc

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 657
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« on: 10 Feb 2005, 01:34 am »
I wonder if anyone has ever compared these two amplifiers? Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

jermmd

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #1 on: 12 May 2005, 11:31 pm »
Anyone have any opinions on this?  My Parasound dealer says he has heard both and the JC1's are superior.  Go figure. :D
I can get the Parasounds for cheaper (under $4000) but I'd like to hear them both on my system before shelling out that kind of money.  There's also the turbo mods being offered on the JC1's for $2300. :o
Has anyone heard this yet?

Joe M.

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #2 on: 12 May 2005, 11:54 pm »
I haven't heard them in the same system and I own the DNA-500, so take my comments however you like.

Although a good amp, I didn't think the JC-1's had the same level of midrange clarity and openess as the DNA-500. I also didn't think they had the same wallop and punch on the bottom.

I have only heard a few amps that produced better music than the DNA-500 and they all cost multiples of the DNA-500.

George

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #3 on: 12 May 2005, 11:56 pm »
Quote from: jermmd
Anyone have any opinions on this?  My Parasound dealer says he has heard both and the JC1's are superior.  Go figure. :D
I can get the Parasounds for cheaper (under $4000) but I'd like to hear them both on my system before shelling out that kind of money.  There's also the turbo mods being offered on the JC1's for $2300. :o
Has anyone heard this yet?

Joe M.


Get a used DNA-500, skip the Turbo mods, and take the money to buy a TacT preamp.  That combo will stop you thinking about upgrading and just put a smile on your face.

George

mcrespo71

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #4 on: 13 May 2005, 12:21 am »
George,

Do you feel the Tact makes amps sound more alike or do you think it does a better job of helping display differences?

Michael

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #5 on: 13 May 2005, 12:23 am »
Quote from: mcrespo71
George,

Do you feel the Tact makes amps sound more alike or do you think it does a better job of helping display differences?

Michael


I feel the TacT allows you to hear more of what your system is trying produce.  It doesn't make things sound alike.

George

jermmd

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #6 on: 13 May 2005, 12:26 am »
Thanks George, I knew how you'd way in on this one.  But, since you've heard the JC1's I have to respect your opinion.  I've got to get over to your house to hear the new speakers.  A TACT or DECQ is definitely in my future.

I might as well add some of the other possibilities to see what people think.  I have also been considering the 120W tubed amps from Dodd Audio that could have been had for $2000 recently.  How about the Ampzilla monoblocks or the Cary CAD500MB.

My speakers are VMPS RM30's.

Joe M.

arthurs

Cary
« Reply #7 on: 13 May 2005, 02:16 am »
I'm taking delivery on the Cary Mono's tomorrow, I've heard them and they are exceptional.  I'll keep you posted.

lonewolfny42

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 16917
  • Speakers....What Speakers ?
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #8 on: 13 May 2005, 04:38 am »
I've heard George's DNA-500 amp....it sounded excellent. There's a good review on 6moons.com . The 500 reminds me of the old Krell amps, but with more power and better dynamics. I've not heard the JC1's. :)

marvda1

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1874
  • freelance reviewer: The Sound Advocate
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #9 on: 13 May 2005, 01:56 pm »
Does anyone know how the Belles 150A Reference monoblocks (500 watts per/$3000 ea.) compare to these two amps?

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #10 on: 13 May 2005, 01:59 pm »
Quote from: lonewolfny42
I've heard George's DNA-500 amp....it sounded excellent. There's a good review on 6moons.com . The 500 reminds me of the old Krell amps, but with more power and better dynamics. I've not heard the JC1's. :)


But without the scratchy, thin mid-range...   :o

I have to say that Chip's review on 6moons really does sum up how the amp performs.  

George

lonewolfny42

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 16917
  • Speakers....What Speakers ?
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #11 on: 14 May 2005, 06:18 am »
Quote from: zybar


Get a used DNA-500, skip the Turbo mods, and take the money to buy a TacT preamp.  That combo will stop you thinking about upgrading and just put a smile on your face.

George
    Speaking of used...just spotted this 500 on Agon...
http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?ampstran&1121180516[/list:u]

jermmd

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #12 on: 14 May 2005, 12:42 pm »
Quote from: lonewolfny42
Quote from: zybar


Get a used DNA-500, skip the Turbo mods, and take the money to buy a TacT preamp.  That combo will stop you thinking about upgrading and just put a smile on your face.

George
    Speaking of used...just spotted this 500 on Agon...
http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?ampstran&1121180516[/list:u]


I can get a new pair of JC1's for $600 cheaper than those.  I sent the guy an email to see if he was able to deal.  I look forward to the review of the Cary's as well.

Joe M.

jermmd

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #13 on: 14 May 2005, 12:43 pm »
Has anyone compared the Ampzilla to these amps?

Joe M.

lonewolfny42

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 16917
  • Speakers....What Speakers ?
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #14 on: 14 May 2005, 02:27 pm »
Quote from: jermmd
Quote from: lonewolfny42
Quote from: zybar


Get a used DNA-500, skip the Turbo mods, and take the money to buy a TacT preamp.  That combo will stop you thinking about upgrading and just put a smile on your face.

George
    Speaking of used...just spotted this 500 on Agon...
http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?ampstran&1121180516[/list:u]


I can get a new pair of JC1's for $600 cheaper than those.  I sent the guy an email to see if he was able to deal.  I look forward to the review of the Cary's as well.

Joe M.
Might be cheaper....but is it better ? :roll:
    At this level...best to hear what your buying...IMO. :) [/list:u]

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #15 on: 14 May 2005, 02:31 pm »
Right on the money as usual Chris.   :thumb:

If Joe can get any of these other amps in on audition, I will lug my DNA-500 over to his place for a comparison.

George

Marbles

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #16 on: 14 May 2005, 03:31 pm »
George, I know you tried the Stratos, and preffered some other amps, but have you ever tried any of the "higher up the line" amps from Klaus?

A pair of Symphonic Line RG4's are killer, and any of the SL Kraft amps would compete very well against the amps mentioned.

Klaus may be able to make a pretty good deal, and I'm sure would offer a demo period.

In fact, I think he would welcome a comparison of the Krafts against about any amps you could find.

lonewolfny42

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 16917
  • Speakers....What Speakers ?
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #17 on: 14 May 2005, 03:45 pm »
Quote from: Marbles


A pair of Symphonic Line RG4's are killer, and any of the SL Kraft amps would compete very well against the amps mentioned.

Klaus may be able to make a pretty good deal, and I'm sure would offer a demo period.

In fact, I think he would welcome a comparison of the Krafts against about any amps you could find.
I found a review on Agon - 2002... http://www.audioasylum.com/audio/general/messages/230122.html
    Do these run "hot" ? :? [/list:u]

Marbles

McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #18 on: 14 May 2005, 04:18 pm »
I had a pair of them in the X - wing case and they run about 100* F in my 70 degree room after playing for a few hours.

I currently have a single RG4 for my center channel to match my Kraft mono amps. It keeps up rather well.

The Kraft 250 is class A only and I have heard runs pretty warm as class A amps mostly do.

My Kraft 400's are class A A/B  and they run approximately the first 130 w in class A then go to class B.

The heatsinks are so big at 75 LB's each that they are only warm.

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
McCormack DNA-500 vs. Parasound JC-1 Monoblocks
« Reply #19 on: 14 May 2005, 05:35 pm »
Quote from: Marbles
George, I know you tried the Stratos, and preffered some other amps, but have you ever tried any of the "higher up the line" amps from Klaus?

A pair of Symphonic Line RG4's are killer, and any of the SL Kraft amps would compete very well against the amps mentioned.

Klaus may be able to make a pretty good deal, and I'm sure would offer a demo period.

In fact, I think he would welcome a comparison of the Krafts against about any amps you could find.


Rob,

I haven't heard any of the symphonic line amps.  What are the specs?

If I remember correctly, these amps get pretty big physically and are also rather expensive (not that the DNA-500 at $7k is cheap).

Do you know what the list is?

I will be honest, I am not really looking for an amp change (I love the DNA-500).  If I did try anything, it would be going with the TacT amps so I could do true digital from source to speakers.

George