0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 13308 times.
I see that the M3 Sapphire specs are now posted on the Spatial Website. Was a bit surprised to see that the M3 are 4 ohms while the M5 are 8 ohms. Should still work as well if not better with my amp.Clayton, What is the min impedance dip on the M3 Sapphire? Wonder if they are a challenge for amps that are not well suited for 2 ohms.
Thx. I am interested in particular how the mid/hi frequency driver sounds. Very curious about the tranparency and musicality of it.
Not sure if this is helpful, but if the sapphire series is anything close to the X series, you guys are in for a real treat.Shakey
Does not appear to have controlled directivity like the X3 and the old M3. But supposed to have a significantly larger stage than the old M3. Fortunately my room has decent treatment so reflections are less of a concern.
I'm curious about this. One of the main reasons I went with the M3 was to eliminate most of my room problems. This would be a concern for me if I ever wanted to upgrade to the Sapphires.
Hello all,My first post here. I am about to receive the M5 Sapphires that I purchased and am really excited to hear them. Has anyone received theirs yet and have any first impressions they care to share?Thanks,Joe
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 27 queries.