0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 4348 times.
The stators are about 7mm apart, the diaphragm thickness is about a third of a millimeter. Tensioning the diaphragm is most critical to proper performance. Over the years we have seen buzzing from three sources:1. Loss of tension in the diaphragm, either from stretching or glue coming loose. Relatively infrequent.2. Magnets dislodged during transport. A loose magnet can touch the diaphragm causing problems. Most common failure mode.3. Thermal failure of trace or diaphragm, caused by overpowe ...
Brian, how much amplitude error and lobing anomolies due to combfilter induced cancellation at the crossover transition point is allowable before you consider it objectionable? Which is worse the phase error due the amplitude error or the phase inversion resulting from a reversed driver? Also do you have any information on distortion products as a function of drive level in the form of graphs showing harmonic and intermodulation distortion with regards to frequency? Thanks, Scotty
The only first-order filters that really follow the theory are quite complex (ever see a Thiel crossover?). Most first-order advocates (Brian isn't the only guilty one) don't execute the filters so that the "advantages" are realized. A simple 1st order electrical combined with a driver will result in acoustic slopes that usually have poor phase behavior, lobing problems, off-axis response peaks / nulls, and inadequate driver protection. Studies have shown these to be much more audible than the "benefits" of first order slopes.
I have been working with the smallest RD driver (the 28.1 which now sadly seems to be discontinued). I have found that this driver equalizes up nicely with some digital eq action. Also i have found that a 2nd order filter at 300Hz gives a very nice blend with the woofer and doesn't seem to suffer greatly from compression issues due to lack of driver travel. Also someone mentioned that the big one measure only about 83db but I am finding more like 86-87 db from my ribbons. The highs can be compensated fo ...
The current VMPS high pass filter to the planars is a second order design -- signal passes through a bank of caps then through an inductor shunted to the ground. Not sure what the frequency is, probably around 166 hz.The low pass filter to the planars is first order -- a hand wound iron core one at that Based on the measured combined tweeter (also on a second order filter) and midrange response there do appear to be some response anomalies. I have already bypassed the planar high pass fil ...
To add an update, I think B, mentioned that he no longer X's at 166Hz. I don't think he has for some time. Most all x-overs were raised higher around the time when the RM30 was introduced.I think all are over 200Hz.
Eric,You lost me on this one. The planars have both high pass and low pass filters to them? Did you mean highpass filter to the planars/tweeter first and then lowpass filter to the plannars only to create a bandpass filter for the plannars?
In short, the spacing between your drivers (center to center) is relative to how high they are allowed to play. The spacing must be shorter than the wavelengths that they are playing to avoid comb filtering. Say your center to center spacing is 5.25", then comb filtering will be present down to as low as 2,560Hz. If the crossover point is below that then you are home free..
So, Why wouldn't I just butt the drivers against each other(midrange drivers)? Would this not give me the highest crossover point? Or do they need to be spaced further for another reason?