Curt:
I'll add my two cents.
Priorities:
REMOTE CONTROL!
Dual outputs -- main/sub or bi-amping
Tape/line-level output (buffered) -- don't use it much, but it would be nice to have this option in the same system as my best source.
Passive (0 and/or less gain) and then active when needed -- max. gain can probably be 6 to 9 DB -- I have not heard a system in the last 10 years with an active preamp than "used" much of the 20 DB that is available in most preamps.
Switch ...
Hi Scott_man,
With the remote your getting into another type of preamp, the Purist is our reference and should remain as clean as possible. This model is where I put all my new ideas and it can change (be revised once or twice a year).
Sabai is the preamp we plan to put a remote in and that's a whole different topic.
Dual outputs, the Purist already has dual outputs (each out has its own buffer).
Passive attenuators are no good for high-end audio (my opinion), impedance matching is required for good quality audio. Some "special" high-quality transformer passives are pretty good but I still think they are too expensive, too limited, and too specialized for most audiophile systems (again my opinion).
The Purist already uses the buffered passive topology (0dB gain) which I believe is the optimum all around solution.
Thanks for your inputs.