0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 84127 times.
Yes, but each and every time you adjusted the preamp's volume control, the subwoofer's volume would remain constant and you would also have to adjust the volume control on the sub.
While I love my $56 Nobsound preamp, I will give this other option a try and will report back on how it sounds when it comes in.I wanted the option on of a 2nd XLR output and wanted to try the better pot. Also, the dual mono configuration should also improvetransparency.We will see.https://www.ebay.com/itm/Passive-Pre-Amplifiers-RCA-and-XLR-Balance-input-and-output/191443244291?_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20160811114145%26meid%3Dacf9d4248da44cccaea92521845340e8%26pid%3D100667%26rk%3D2%26rkt%3D8%26sd%3D192229314729%26itm%3D191443244291&_trksid=p2045573.c100667.m2042
Nelson isn't fussy about non critical parts and recommends what's easily accessible to most people. The Chinese dacts are based on real DACT pots so I doubt he would recommend them for IP reasons and the real ones are very expensive. These Chinese dacts have been around for years now and used widely in diy. Diyaudio was where they were first discussed IIRC.
The SMD Dact passive is.... well, it's OK. On my system, the high end/frequencies are more forward with more clarity but ever so slightly harsher (at louder levels) than my Odyssey Tempest. But soundstage isn't as good. They make my system sound more like the music is coming from two speakers without as much depth or layers. I think (though I could be wrong?) it doesn't go as low. The overall bass is much less full across the lower frequencies though tighter (quicker/more "snap") with less wooliness than the Tempest. I think that the Odyssey also sounds smoother overall. I prefer the Odyssey with it's trade-off than with this passive.
The Dale Resistor unit sounds tempting. Here is one you can build. http://www.hi-fi-insight.com/custom-passive-pre-amp.html
To me this reads that there's something off in your stereo, not the volume control device. While it may not be perfect, it's better than pots you'll find in the most expensive stereos in the world. But I don't know the details of everything in your stereo so I can't comment for sure as to what's up.
You can see my system by clicking on my System link to the side. It's been a while, I could try another comparison using the digital out on my CD player/transport directly into the UltraDac - I don't remember if I compared them that way. I know I've done it with my computer>SPDiF converter> Ultra Dac>....
Has anyone compared the Chinese passive to a Tisbury passive?
Well i hooked it up last night and the xlrs output did not work.The left volume control was not working and the sound was Always on. I used the single ended outputs and things work just fine. Still want the xlrs to work, but from a sound perspective it was much better than the nobsound. Space around the instruments, detail, attack. More musical. A bargain for sure.I’ll work with the guy and see if I can get the problem corrected.Huge improvement in my system. A little spooky actually, didn’t expect this much improvement.
A lot of good information was in this thread.At the end of the day what is the best pot available with a focus of sound regardless of the cost?