earlier back in this thread I complimented a MOD, for a exquisite comment they made on the useless-ness
and futility of ironing out certain audio debates on sound and/vs measurement of audio potential.
It was a lot to say, but said in a small space, and not with out some poetic forgiveness to all involved.
At that time I had not yet watched the "Null Test" which i just viewed and could not get thru more then 8 mins of.
It becomes most clear to me that it is most possible to Channel Water, thru boxes, pipes, ravines, with a almost, but never wholly predictable out come. but with the infinite quality's of water and all the things that effect it, which science now recognizes as one of the most complex and misunderstood substances on earth, its almost impossible to predict weither if at the end of that journey, you throw a cup of that water on the frozen ground ..........you will get beautiful lace like frozen crystals or dead black ice.
What even the UK's premier White Paper physical sciences magazine "Nature" cautiously but wholly admitted to- is the quality of that water is/will depend on,,,,drum roll please -
The natures of the people standing around watching it.
Any one wanting to understand this fact may pursue this subject on their own, I take no great pleasure in debated this stuff, or at least don't anymore, as I find the same sensitivity that gives rise in me to differentials of wire sounds also inclines me to shy from combative exercises in trying to explain
"Colors in Numbers".
Ladies and Gentleman, I lay out this statement for us all, it's a poetry thing, and weither in delusion
or experiential fact of joy, The proof is in the pudding that, one side of this sound observation group is much more tolerant then, and of the other, I must wonder what it is the more tolerant side is hearing that gives them all the more patience.