Ted,
Well, you didn't quote me correctly, but no matter. Thanks for the clarification on the DEQX methodology. The two step approach seems like a much better way of doing it....I wasn't aware this is how the unit operates. Good info. Thanks.
Davey.
I'm sorry; I cut-n-pasted cuz the quote paragraph was too big....and then screwed it up. Gee, I have a future on Fox News, or is it the NY Times?
Anyway, glad you got my point, in spite of it all. I have yet to try the speaker correction (my RM/X's are behemoths) but will take it on this weekend. The DEQX workflow takes some getting used to, but now the room measurement process is pretty well understood. I like the nature of the sweeps, the averaging algorithms, and the ease at which you draw the eq functions (freq, q, etc.) The crossover stuff is new to me....so I will now bow out of this thread....again.
Ted_B