0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 31065 times.
I will surely miss the placement flexibility of the Maraschinos. My rig is all set up to not have an amp in the rack.
Who would you like to see review this amp? We're looking for someone with at least a double digit pro review history and very high quality speakers.... Thanks.
Tommy, there is one specific reviewer that comes to mind; his name is Steven Stone. He writes for both The Absolute Sound and Home Theater Review. Unlike some writers, he can elucidate his thoughts straight up without requiring one to read in between the lines. He's a member of Audio Circle and checks in every so often. I don't know how he determines if he's writing for one publication or the other, but that's a discussion you might want to have with him. Here's a link to his profile... https://hometheaterreview.com/steven-stones-associated-equipment/
Is there any significant benefit to upgrading Cherry amps if your speakers have very high efficiency and you never listen at ear bleeding levels? In other words, do Cherry amps have basically the same sound signature and high level of resolution, but just have differences in power depending upon one's needs? For instance, my ILMs have 140 wpc into 8 ohms and I use 98 dB speakers. If I upgraded to a Cherry Stereo with 360 wpc or a MEGAschino with 1,000 wpc, are we talking about subtle, significant or negligible improvements?
Same reason they put all that horsepower in a Dodge Demon or Vette, doubtful it will ever to totally utilized, but damn fun just the same!
Not sure that's a good analogy. My previous amp had twice the horsepower of the ILMs, but there's no decrease in headroom with the ILMs. In fact, the opposite occurred. I'm sure there's lots of other factors.This begs the question -- what does "headroom" sound like? More headroom, I suppose, sounds like increased dynamics, greater micro detail, and an unrestrained, effortless (i.e., cleaner) sound???
Tommy, can you post measurement curves for the Megs? I am sure many here would be curious to see:Distortion vs power @ 4 ohmsDistortion vs frequency @ 4 ohms and 200 watts! kHz square wave @ 4 ohms10 kHz square wave @ 4 ohms1 kHz distortion spectrum18.5 kHz + 19.5 kHz IMD spectrum @ 4 ohms/200 watts
After listening to the Mega for a couple weeks I love the soundstage. It's much larger than the Ultra, which I thought was large. There's much more detail and body to the music which is one of the things I listen for. I took the Mega to my buddy's house (who is the former president of our local audio club and a musician) and his comment was that he enjoyed the huge/wide soundstage the Mega put out. He did not hear that with his Rowland monoblock digital amps as clearly as he did with the Mega. He noticed how the instruments were individually spread out across the soundstage on good recordings (which is all we used). The more I listen to the Mega the more I hear those things that draw me into the music even deeper. That's my quick/short update on my couple weeks with the Megaschino.Larry D.
* Optimized for SONICS above all else ---- we start with amazing bench specs, like 128dB SNR, then we tweak for sound AFTER that* Black background and micro-dynamics ---- 120dB SNR, 0.005% THD+N at low power* High power ---- MEGAschino channel boards are capable of comfortably driving up to 1000W into 4Ω and up to 2000W into 2Ω* Extended bandwidth ---- up to 150kHz !!!