0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 10598 times.
Actually $27,000 is a good deal. Dollartimes.com says $4,000 from 1957 is the equivalent to $34,278.99 in 2016.This is of course the mighty Paragon.http://www.audioheritage.org/html/profiles/jbl/paragon.htmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBL_ParagonI love this picture with Benny Goodman.As to the the question of using it today with a flat panel HDTV. Personally, sign me up as soon as I win the lottery. Off the internet and out in the real world there is a niche of builders doing Paragon and Hartsfield reproductions. To play in that sandbox bring a checkbook with five figures of disposable income ready. For sellers of such systems the challange thus becomes finding a buyer with the income, who is both a dedicated audiophile and lives in a home featuring mid-century modern design.
Almost 30 years ago while living in Cleveland one of these was advertised locally for abt $1K. I lived in a high rise and measured the elevator and it wouldn't fit so I passed.
That JBL speaker is the first one in my audio life that really impressed meand it takes a lot to impress me.It was a long, long time ago at an audio show in Montreal,they were playing a female singer and you would swear that she was with us in that small hotel room.I also like the look of the unit.Guy 13on planet Vietnam.
What amuses me is that it was JBL's original intention that what is now known as the Paragon was to be the center channel only, with two flanking speakers like these Hartsfields:Cooler minds prevailed and it was decided that the vast room needed for such a system would limit sales, so the concept was made more modest and the Paragon was born. This from the Lansing Heritage page:http://www.audioheritage.org/html/profiles/jbl/paragon.htm
You need to see what goes on in Japan for these classics:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRI5DArFBMYPremium restored for sale:http://jbl43.com/?pid=68999803In Japanese but you get the idea.Jim