0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 18588 times.
Obviously the Aikido or Pass B1 don't change the signal as much as this chinese amplifier. The schematic is supposed to be of the chinese amp and to some it might show why this amp has sound of its own or if output is inverted:
The output is non-inverted (2 inverting stages = non-inverting from in to out). I think there are some problems with this circuit. It looks like a version of the Dyna PAS type line stage, but with the volume control on the output. The volume control VR1 is on the output of the circuit. That means it will load down the feedback loop from the plate of the second stage to the cathode of the first stage. The preamp will change level of distortion, tonal quality, and frequency response as you change the setting of the volume control. That's just bad design, imo. Another problem with the volume control being on the output is that the first stage will always see full blast output from the source (player). Let's say you're feeding the output from a DAC to this preamp. If that DAC is playing loud pop music, there will likely be long-duration signal peaks up near 2V RMS (2.83V peak). Those peaks could very well draw grid current from the first stage 6N3, which will reduce the input impedance of the first stage and cause the source's output stage to distort. This distortion cannot be fixed by the feedback loop in the preamp (R5 and C3 going to the first stage cathode). R1, the input 'grid leak' resistor, is only 10k, so will present a heavy load on tube phono preamps like the RCA circuit that use ECC83/12AX7/6N2P with no output buffer. If you do use a phono preamp like this with this line stage, it'll sound like poop, I assure you. You could try fixing this by changing R1 to something like 470k, but that would make the first stage's grid current problem much worse, defeating the purpose of the larger value R1. It may be that the extra harmonic distortion from this preamp is euphonic and pleasing to hear, and could be adding some 'body' to the sound from the TPA3116. The end result could be pleasing, but I don't think adjectives like 'detailed' and 'transparent' would be accurate. I'll put this circuit into a spice simulation program and see what that says. Could be interesting... --
Rather than analyzing the circuit design and judging the sound based on theory or conjecture, it might be useful to give the unit a listen. I've got a modest assortment of amps and preamps and one SS buffer (the aforementioned B1) in house, and this little puppy (with the tubes previously mentioned) sounds quite good to me. And not 'good' like old fashioned tubed good (rolled off highs, slow transients, vague imaging, emphasized midbass and indistinct low bass). Given it's dirt cheap price, I just figured some folks here with a very modest budget might wanna give it a listen. So far mine has been reliable, quiet (no hum), and in general an absolute delight.
I'd be interested to hear comparisons between this and a Schiit Saga. I wish this one had a remote and 4-5 inputs though