0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 25982 times.
They do weigh a ton for their size. I believe each speaker shipped at 38 pounds. I have an Oppo BDP-93 (as a transport) running to an Exogal Comet DAC (also used as "preamp") into the new SST Son of Ampzilla II amplifier. The combination is marvelous. Still breaking in - but together - the best I've had. Interestingly, so far, I haven't felt the need for a subwoofer. I have a couple, someday I will throw them into the mix. New Year's resolution: Start streaming music . . . whatever that is
Nice! Would love to see a pic of the whole system.
Those look great. Are they breaking in well?Do you live in New Glarus? Or just like their beer? I'm just up the road from NG, about 15 miles in Verona.
Congrats on the purchase. They look wonderful.
Jim's work is even more gorgeous when you get to see it up close and in person.
Both We are, indeed, neighbors!! Drive through Verona all the time on way into Madison. And live about 2 miles from the brewery . . . Fat Squirrel and Milk Stout nowadays. The speakers and amp are doing great together . . . haven't been listening a whole lot lately as we're finishing off a lower level where my audio gear will find its new home.
If you are ever giving demos, I'd love to hear them. I do get into New Glarus from time to time.
Hi,Just wondering what made you choose the SST Son of Ampzilla II's? Did you get the opportunity to compare different amplifiers.Really good quality and value system you have at your home.Cheers Rod
How do these differ from the original Silk? I see they both use the RAAL tweeter but other than using the AT instead of the Scanspeak, what other differences? Are the dimensions the same? Frequency response?
Certainly the AT is the major difference. The regular Silks are 8” W x 14” H x 11” D and play down to 42Hz as per Salk’s website. My “Silk AT’s” are a bit bigger measuring 9” W x 16” H x 12” D. Their sensitivity is 87db and frequency response is 47Hz – 40kHz +/-3db. I do have a frequency response graph somewhere if you are interested. Both speakers are front ported. I notice the tweeters on the Silks are “offset” a bit in their cabinets. The Silk AT’s tweeters are not – they are dead center in their cabinets.
Question, is this the same AT driver used in the Vapor Audio Cirrus Black?