0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 13624 times.
Would you have some recommendations in mind? I've the circle for your posts on OB. It seems GR Research offers 12" subs for OB as well as servo amps. Are other combos that'd meet my need?
Hey Rich,A question regarding high Qts vs low Qts on open baffle drivers, mainly bass drivers. I've been using the Alpha 15 which has a relatively high Qts of 1.26. In the process of upgrading my open baffle design with a little more effective bass driver, the Alpha 15. I've had some recommendations like the Delta 15lfa or even the Definimax which have a Qts in the mid 50s. If I use one of the lower Qts drivers and not use EQ, could I get by with bass boost on my plate amp?
The Alpha 15 is ok in my current application (18 in baffle with 12 in wings on the back). The bass is sometimes a little thin and not focused. Right now I am not using a separate amp on the bass. The main amp is driving the mids and bass (with a cap and inductor filter).
rabbit - Appreciate your sharing your own experiences. Sorry to hear that the Silver Iris did not do it for you. I know of several folks who love them, so as with many things it often comes down to listening preferences.
Just a couple additions about the PureAudioProject drivers. Besides the basic Eminence Alpha 15, there is an updated version that uses a thicker stamped frame, and more importantly shorting rings in the voice coil motor. That should cut distortion significantly. The last, I want to call it a premium version has a cast frame (looks like from delta lite) neo magnets and shorting rings. I haven't seen any specs on these new drivers, but they are made in cooperation with Eminence engineering. The Neo drivers were playing at the California show. The passive crossover integration with the TB driver sounded good. Like most 8" full rangers the frequency response is tipped up on axis. Off axis, they were very nice. They also probably can take more abuse than a Lowther or Fostex unit.I would build the system with active DSP and crossover. The system is very modular lending itself to easy updates.
Hi All,Just an update on my search: I went to a local dealer to listen to the maggies. I spent about 30 minutes on the 0.7 and 90 minutes on the 1.7i. For sure, the 1.7i have a fuller presentation of an orchestra. Both speakers are driven by a Naim SuperNait2 (80w/ch). The amp and the 1.7i were able to present a couple of my favorite concertos with the expected size of the concert hall and the fullness of most of the instruments. I believe the room was well treated with all sorts of acoustic panels, and there was 2.5 to 3 feet behind the maggies. It was a very enjoyable experience, especially the presentation on the string instruments. They just sound more real and natural than my monitor speakers. But with the piano concerto, the presentation seems to have a little less with the 'attack' yet the ambient of the hall was very good. And with other jazz pieces as well as some test tracks that contain more precussion passages, the 'attack' seemed to be satisfying (ie, I didn't feel the need of looking for them).After coming back to reality, I started to search for reviews and used equipments for the new set of maggie 1.7i and the Naim integrated are way over my budget. I saw a review on 'enjoy the music' (I think) on the 3.6, the reviewer seem to commenting the maggies tend to have narrow sweet spot comparing to cone speakers: is this your experience? (I guess I'd also start a post in the planner circle inquiring users' experience too).I'm not fully won over just yet. I wish there are some users of open baffle speaker within an hour drive that I can visit. Enjoy the remainder of the long weekend with your music.