0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 486700 times.
We didn't compare the 2000 vs the 1500 as monos directly. But we liked the cryo'd 1500 better than 1500s as monos. And I could see going either way on 2000 in stereo vs 2 monos. Will be making that comparison more as the 2000s break in. Mono bridged vs stereo did seem to change the character of the sound more. Jack was noticing this more than I did, so I will let him speak to that. I was paying more attention to the bass, where bridged had the advantage.
Hi Guys,Great time at Roscoe's house. His new speakers are very large and cool looking. I have to keep it short because I just got home and have family commitments. Roscoe pretty much summed it up for me. First of all thanks to Roscoe for the opportunity to hear his system. It's very impressive. In my system, the Crown amp was powerful but lacked soundstage and was very 2D sounding. It was not apparent until I compared it to the NCore. The Crown was forward and although it did a lot of things right, it lacked refinement and was a bit fatiguing. The NCore threw a deep and wide image with gobs of detail and excellent harmonics that were lacking in the XLS. Also the NCore was happiest plugged directly into the wall outlet with no power conditioning. Roscoe's system required us to plug all amps into a power conditioner and the positioning of the speakers mandated listening with the tweeters above our ears by quite a bit, probably well above our heads. Also, his Musical Fidelity preamp is much more laid back than my SAS. His SP Tech speakers really like a LOT of power and I preferred the Crown 2000, single amp to any of the combinations we tried. For some reason, the bridged pair seemed to lack air and detail and was a bit dark sounding in comparison. The crown 1500 amps did not sound as good as the 2000, but I preferred the cryo version to the non cryo by a wide margin. That was a surprise because I thought cryo treatment was snake oil. My ears told me otherwise. Roscoe's room is relatively narrow and does not allow for soeakers to be pulled out Into the room. As a result the soundstage is not deep. It sounds very good and we all have different preferences but this is a conversation for another day. On his system, I preferred the crown 2000 because it had excellent balance and really impressive bass. The SP Techs just seemed to lack bass when powered by the NCoreIn my system, the Crown is not a viable option but if you have power hungry or dark sounding gear, the Crown could be a great choice. Those 2000 amps are a clear step up from the 1500's. Makes me wonder how the 2500 would sound on Roscoe's system! Lastly, no magic wooden picks were used during this evaluation.
OK, but what did you think of the sound overall , is it hi-end ?
OK, who is going to hook these up to a pair of VR4 jr's?
I am thinking I want to get a 2500 just for 2 channel listening. For the price it seems like a natural. I sure wish they were better looking. How difficult do you think it would be to machine a new front plate for these? I think it would make a huge difference.
I thought the same thing. I tried to take the front grill off in an effort to paint it black but had a heck of a time figuring how to detach it from the board without damaging anything. If somebody figures it out please share how. It's not that ugly but painting it a different color could help ease the asthetics.I'd like to know more how the 2000 sounded different than the 1500. Ozarktom said earlier in the thread that he couldn't hear a difference.
I would suggest that the difference is 100% down to raw power.Other reviews (other sites) have also made the same comment - other than power (current, voltage) the 1500, 2000 and 2500 sound the same.If your speakers need more current/voltage then get the bigger beast, if you want to play safe, get the bigger beast, if you want to get best value for money - get the one that suits your speakers needs...
I happened to stumble across a review on a home theater site last year where a guy was driving some Revel Salon's for two channel . He stated the Crown was the best amp he had used on the revels , even after using some real big buck amps . He described them as very neutral .Definitely can spend more on ones speakers with the savings of money . got to like that !
The suspense of what OzarkTom thinks about the modified unit is getting to me. It needs a few hours, but still....