0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 14558 times.
The NFL owners need to make a policy - official or unofficial - that when there is a player with substance and/or domestic issues that gets released, the other teams agree NOT to sign him for a given period of time, say 12mo. Some sort of agreed upon time frame. Otherwise, it's essentially a form of enabling. If these guys think they can beat women, do drugs, drink excessively, etc, still knowing they'll get chance after chance in the NFL, that only makes things worse.
Even if they wanted to, the players union would never let it happen. They have a labor agreement.
Thats why I say "unofficial" if necessary...they can simply make a gentlemen's agreement not to sign people like that. There are character clauses on NFL contracts, as well. The players aren't guaranteed the right to a team...it's up to the owners if they choose to sign a player or not. Continuing to give people like this millions of dollars is not good for anyone.
Can you say "Collusion"?
Okay. You guys are right. Lets just keep enabling them....nothing wrong with a few more women getting beat up, right? After all, business is what's most important. Heck, I may even enter the bidding war myself for Johnny next year
Don't get me wrong - I wish they could do things like you suggest. The Courts keep saying otherwise. Don't get me going on Court rulings......
OTOH, if it's collusion to keep players' salaries down, that would be a slam dunk.
Salaries should be capped at $100,000/year (or lower)...
Yeah, and corporations shouldn't be greedy, and politicians should have the best interest of the people at heart, and everyone should voluntarily pay their share of taxes, and we should all just follow the Golden Rule... but that's not the world we live in. Back to Johnny Ex-Football... his ex-girlfriend has changed her mind and is pressing charges. He's toast.
How low has life gotten when you get life advice FROM Charlie Sheen?