@mjock3,
you are missing the point!
No one here goes by the numbers and uses these numbers as a subtitute for human judgement.
As i said before, "appreciation of audio" leads you to say that you like your "subjective human experience" with the modded amp better than the "experience" with the stock amp. And that's perfectly fine - no one has ever doubted that part.
But comments like 'improvement', 'natural', 'accurate', 'real' or 'like at the live recording' are not subjective appreciations, they are absolute statements relating to some objective reference (eg. the live experience). And even more, these statements are mostly bolded by adjectives 'greatly', 'huge' etc.
How can anyone make such absolute statements not even beeing in the recording rooms where the recordings were done, meaning without having that 'objective reference = live experience'?
I find it even more strange that these statements are mostly made after listening in rooms that have barely acoustic treatement or none at all ...